急性中重型颅脑损伤后亚低温治疗对凝血功能及预后的影响

张志花, 赵平, 汤建磊, 等. 急性中重型颅脑损伤后亚低温治疗对凝血功能及预后的影响[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2024, 25(1): 28-31. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2024.01.006
引用本文: 张志花, 赵平, 汤建磊, 等. 急性中重型颅脑损伤后亚低温治疗对凝血功能及预后的影响[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2024, 25(1): 28-31. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2024.01.006
ZHANG Zhihua, ZHAO Ping, TANG Jianlei, et al. Effect of mild hypothermia on coagulation function and prognosis after acute moderate to severe craniocerebral injury[J]. J Clin Emerg, 2024, 25(1): 28-31. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2024.01.006
Citation: ZHANG Zhihua, ZHAO Ping, TANG Jianlei, et al. Effect of mild hypothermia on coagulation function and prognosis after acute moderate to severe craniocerebral injury[J]. J Clin Emerg, 2024, 25(1): 28-31. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2024.01.006

急性中重型颅脑损伤后亚低温治疗对凝血功能及预后的影响

详细信息

Effect of mild hypothermia on coagulation function and prognosis after acute moderate to severe craniocerebral injury

More Information
  • 目的 研究急性中度至重度创伤性脑损伤患者凝血功能障碍特点及亚低温疗法对其预后影响。方法 这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2021年6月—2023年6月江苏大学附属武进医院重症医学科收治的中度至重度脑外伤的所有成年患者(152例),获得了患者人口统计学和创伤特征的详细信息,根据患者28 d的预后分为存活组(107例)和死亡组(45例);根据不同治疗方式分为亚低温治疗组(69例)和对照组(83例)。检测亚低温组和对照组入住重症医学科之后不同时间点凝血功能指标。结果 对比入选患者存活组与死亡组治疗前即刻凝血功能情况,死亡组凝血酶原时间、凝血酶时间、活化部分凝血活酶时间明显延长和D-二聚体明显增高,各组间差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。存活组患者的亚低温组治疗结束后纤维蛋白原高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论 凝血功能障碍在急性中重型颅脑损伤后很常见,而亚低温治疗可能对凝血功能有一定影响,值得进一步研究。
  • 加载中
  • 表 1  患者基本临床资料 X±S

    项目 28 d预后 治疗方式
    存活组(107例) 死亡组(45例) t/χ2 P 亚低温组(69例) 对照组(83例) t/χ2 P
    年龄/岁 58.21±17.79 59.20±17.69 -0.312 0.755 55.64±17.52 60.89±17.61 -1.836 0.068
    高血压/例 55 25 0.595 0.734 33 47 2.193 0.334
    冠心病/例 6 5 1.390 0.238 3 8 0.837 0.360
    肾功能不全/例 1 2 0.611 0.434 0 3 - Fisher=0.251
    脑血管病/例 9 3 0.133 0.716 5 7 0.073 0.787
    糖尿病/例 13 5 0.033 0.856 6 12 1.198 0.274
    APACH Ⅱ/分 17.72±6.72 19.58±7.82 -1.482 0.140 18.22±7.934 18.31±6.332 -0.083 0.934
    GCS评分/分 7.79±2.92 7.69±3.02 0.184 0.855 7.59±3.084 7.89±2.824 -0.620 0.536
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  各组患者在急性中重度颅脑损伤后治疗前即刻凝血功能变化 X±S

    项目 28 d预后 治疗方式
    存活组(107例) 死亡组(45例) t/χ2 P 亚低温组(69例) 对照组(83例) t/χ2 P
    PT/s 12.06±1.68 17.78±17.63 -3.336 0.001 13.35±8.68 14.10±10.97 -0.455 0.647
    TT/s 18.47±6.68 23.95±14.37 -3.215 0.002 20.45±9.55 19.79±10.21 0.407 0.684
    INR 2.05±5.05 1.70±2.31 0.443 0.659 1.52±3.39 2.31±5.14 -1.087 0.279
    APTT/s 25.22±7.71 32.91±17.01 -3.841 0.001 27.92±9.34 27.14±13.50 0.407 0.685
    Fib/(g/L) 2.60±1.3 2.15±1.40 1.858 0.065 2.59±1.70 2.36±1.01 1.021 0.309
    D-D/(mg/L) 19.18±26.36 37.99±67.01 -2.483 0.014 19.07±28.33 29.37±52.02 -1.471 0.144
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  各组患者治疗结束后24 h凝血功能 X±S

    项目 存活组 死亡组
    亚低温组(50例) 对照组(57例) t/χ2 P 亚低温组(19例) 对照组(26例) t/χ2 P
    PT /s 12.16±2.01 11.81±1.82 0.974 0.332 12.67±3.58 16.75±17.53 -1.279 0.208
    TT/s 15.35±2.81 15.16±2.07 0.416 0.678 17.42±9.64 24.90±22.31 -1.369 0.178
    INR 1.23±1.12 1.16±0.93 0.388 0.699 1.12±0.22 2.03±2.98 -1.316 0.195
    APTT/s 28.37±4.49 27.90±4.27 0.559 0.577 31.58±6.34 37.83±30.27 -0.883 0.383
    Fib/(g/L) 5.86±2.82 4.88±1.90 2.131 0.035 4.88±3.03 3.92±1.78 2.724 0.009
    D-D/(mg/L) 9.55±31.85 4.65±6.48 1.135 0.259 6.85±7.76 21.45±30.67 -2.020 0.050
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Basha AK, Mahmoud MA, Al Ashwal MI, et al. Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Single Institution Experience in a Middle-Income Country[J]. Front Surg, 2021, 8: 690723. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.690723

    [2]

    Robinson CP. Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury[J]. Continuum(Minneap Minn), 2021, 27(5): 1278-1300.

    [3]

    曹霞, 张蓉蓉, 薛晓宏. 颅内压联合PCT与NSE监测对重型颅脑损伤患者病情的预测价值研究[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2023, 24(3): 137-142. https://lcjz.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2023.03.006

    [4]

    Krishnamoorthy V, Komisarow JM, Laskowitz DT, etal. Multiorgan Dysfunction After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Clinical Management[J]. Chest, 2021, 160(3): 956-964. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.016

    [5]

    郑曙光, 项彦斌. 床旁即时超声测量视神经鞘直径与重型颅脑损伤患者术后颅内压增高的关系研究[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2022, 23(10): 715-719. https://lcjz.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2022.10.006

    [6]

    Marc M. Coagulopathy and Progression of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Traumatic Brain Injury: Mechanisms, Impact, andTherapeutic Considerations[J]. Neurosurgery, 2021, 89(6): 954-966. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyab358

    [7]

    Kockelmann F, Maegele M. Acute Haemostatic Depletion and Failure in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury(TBI): Pathophysiological and Clinical Considerations[J]. J Clin Med. 2023, 12(8): 2809. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082809

    [8]

    Jin J, Wang F, Tian J, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps contribute to coagulopathy after traumatic brain injury[J]. JCI Insight, 2023, 8(6): e141110. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.141110

    [9]

    中国研究型医院学会神经再生与修复专业委员会心脏重症脑保护学组, 中国研究型医院学会神经再生与修复专业委员会神经重症护理与康复学组. 亚低温脑保护中国专家共识[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2020, 32(4): 385-391. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200117-00137

    [10]

    卢安阳, 吕汝琦. 呼气末二氧化碳动态变化与亚低温治疗的心肺复苏患者神经预后的关系研究[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2022, 23(8): 548-552. https://lcjz.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2022.08.002

    [11]

    张丽娜, 蒋渊, 艾宇航. 重症神经系统疾病患者救治: 保护为先[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志(网络版), 2020, 6(3): 241-243.

    [12]

    Kumar M. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017[J]. Lancet, 2018, 392(10159): 1923-1994. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32225-6

    [13]

    Picetti E, Rossi S, Abu-Zidan FM, et al. WSES consensus conference guidelines: monitoring and management of severe adult traumatic brain injury patients with polytrauma in the first 24 hours[J]. World J Emerg Surg, 2019, 14: 53. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0270-1

    [14]

    中国医师协会急诊医师分会, 中国医药教育协会急诊医学专业委员会, 成人急危重症脑损伤患者目标温度管理临床实践专家共识组. 成人急危重症脑损伤患者目标温度管理临床实践专家共识[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2019, 28(3): 282-291.

    [15]

    陈益磊, 刘劲芳. 颅脑创伤后凝血功能障碍的研究进展[J]. 国际神经病学神经外科学杂志, 2020, 47(2): 208-212.

    [16]

    Lai JQ, Shi YC, Lin S, et al. Metabolic disorders on cognitive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury[J]. Trends Endocrinol Metab, 2022, 33(7): 451-462. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2022.04.003

    [17]

    Bossers SM, Mansvelder F, Loer SA, et al. Association between prehospital end-tidal carbon dioxide levels and mortality in patients with suspected severe traumatic brain injury[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2023, 49(5): 491-504. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07012-z

    [18]

    彭羽, 林赟, 侯晓林, 等. 亚低温治疗对脑出血模型大鼠动物行为学的影响及其机制[J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2020, 40(9): 1359-1364.

    [19]

    Jo KW. Target temperature management in traumatic brain injury with a focus on adverse events, recognition, and prevention[J]. Acute Crit Care, 2022, 37(4): 483-490. doi: 10.4266/acc.2022.01291

    [20]

    常盼盼, 刘畅, 崇巍. 严重创伤性脑损伤后凝血功能障碍与预后的关系[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2019, 48(5): 425-429.

    [21]

    Hui J, Feng J, Tu Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of long-term mild hypothermia for severe traumatic brain injury with refractory intracranial hypertension(LTH-1): A multicenter randomized controlled trial[J]. E Clin Med, 2021, 32: 100732.

    [22]

    曲鑫. 神经重症患者目标温度管理的研究进展[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(6): 485-489.

    [23]

    Juffermans NP, Wirtz MR, Balvers K, et al. Towards patient-specific management of trauma hemorrhage: the effect of resuscitation therapy on parameters of thromboelastometry[J]. J Thromb Haemost, 2019, 17(3): 441-448. doi: 10.1111/jth.14378

    [24]

    Fletcher-Sandersjoo A, Thelin EP, Maegele M, et al. Time Course of Hemostatic Disruptions After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of the Literature[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2021, 34(2): 635-656. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01037-8

    [25]

    Cooper DJ, Nichol AD, Bailey M, et al. Effect of Early Sustained Prophylactic Hypothermia on Neurologic Outcomes Among Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: The POLAR Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA, 2018, 320(21): 2211-2220. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.17075

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  428
  • PDF下载数:  117
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2023-09-05
刊出日期:  2024-01-10

目录