急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死并发心源性休克患者血清Ang-2和IFABP水平与入院后28天内生存的关系

梁卫章, 石建平, 韩爱子. 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死并发心源性休克患者血清Ang-2和IFABP水平与入院后28天内生存的关系[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2024, 25(7): 357-363. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2024.07.007
引用本文: 梁卫章, 石建平, 韩爱子. 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死并发心源性休克患者血清Ang-2和IFABP水平与入院后28天内生存的关系[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2024, 25(7): 357-363. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2024.07.007
LIANG Weizhang, SHI Jianping, HAN Aizi. Relationship between serum Ang-2 and IFABP levels and survival within 28 days after admission in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock[J]. J Clin Emerg, 2024, 25(7): 357-363. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2024.07.007
Citation: LIANG Weizhang, SHI Jianping, HAN Aizi. Relationship between serum Ang-2 and IFABP levels and survival within 28 days after admission in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock[J]. J Clin Emerg, 2024, 25(7): 357-363. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2024.07.007

急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死并发心源性休克患者血清Ang-2和IFABP水平与入院后28天内生存的关系

  • 基金项目:
    河北省医学科学研究课题计划项目(No:20210472)
详细信息

Relationship between serum Ang-2 and IFABP levels and survival within 28 days after admission in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock

More Information
  • 目的 探究血清血管生成素-2(angiopoietin-2,Ang-2)、肠型脂肪酸结合蛋白(intestinal fatty acid binding protein,IFABP)水平与急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(ST segment elevation myocardial infarction,STEMI)并发心源性休克(cardiogenic shock,CS)患者入院后28 d内生存的关系。方法 选取邯郸市中心医院2020年5月—2023年10月收治的162例STEMI患者,有61例患者就诊时并发CS(并发CS组),101例患者就诊时没有并发CS(非CS组);另选取健康者98例作为对照组。根据入院后28 d生存情况将并发CS组分成生存组(患者存活)34例和死亡组(患者死亡)27例。收集所有受试者临床资料,检测实验室指标和血清Ang-2、IFABP水平;分析STEMI并发CS患者血清Ang-2、IFABP与临床资料、实验室指标的相关性,STEMI并发CS患者入院后28 d内生存的影响因素,Ang-2、IFABP预测STEMI并发CS患者入院后28 d内生存的价值。结果 与对照组比较,非CS组和并发CS组空腹血糖(fasting plasma glucose,FPG)、总胆固醇(total cholesterol,TC)、甘油三酯(triglyceride,TG)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(low density lipoprotein-cholesterol,LDL-C)、肌酸激酶同工酶(creatine kinase isoenzyme,CK-MB)、同型半胱氨酸(homocysteine,Hcy)、心肌肌钙蛋白I(cardiac troponin I,cTnI)、Ang-2、IFABP水平显著升高,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(high density lipoprotein cholesterol,HDL-C)、左心室射血分数(left ventricular ejection fraction,LVEF)水平显著降低(P < 0.05)。与非CS组比较,并发CS组多支心肌罪犯血管数患者比例、TC、TG、CK-MB、Hcy、cTnI、Ang-2、IFABP水平显著升高,HDL-C、LVEF水平显著降低(P < 0.05)。与生存组比较,死亡组糖尿病史、高脂血症史、多支心肌罪犯血管数患者比例、FPG、TC、TG、LDL-C、CK-MB、Hcy、cTnI、Ang-2、IFABP水平显著升高,HDL-C、LVEF水平显著降低(P < 0.05)。STEMI并发CS患者血清Ang-2与IFABP水平呈正相关(P < 0.05);血清Ang-2、IFABP均与糖尿病史、高脂血症史、心肌罪犯血管数量、FPG、TC、TG、LDL-C、CK-MB、Hcy、cTnI呈正相关,与HDL-C、LVEF呈负相关(P < 0.05)。有糖尿病史、有高脂血症史、多支心肌罪犯血管数、FPG、TC、TG、LDL-C、CK-MB、Hcy、cTnI、Ang-2、IFABP均是影响STEMI并发CS患者入院后28 d内生存的独立危险因素,HDL-C、LVEF均是影响STEMI并发CS患者入院后28 d内生存的独立保护因素(P < 0.05)。相较于血清Ang-2、IFABP单独预测STEMI并发CS患者入院后28 d内生存的曲线下面积(AUC)(0.741、0.759),二者联合预测的AUC(0.836)更高(P < 0.05)。结论 STEMI并发CS患者血清Ang-2、IFABP水平较高,其高水平可能导致患者入院后28 d内死亡,Ang-2和IFABP联合检测对STEMI并发CS患者入院后28 d内生存有较高预测价值。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  血清Ang-2、IFABP、二者联合预测STEMI并发CS患者入院后28 d内生存的ROC曲线

    表 1  对照组、非CS组、并发CS组临床资料、实验室指标及血清Ang-2、IFABP水平的比较 X±S

    组别 对照组(98例) 非CS组(101例) 并发CS组(61例) F/χ2 P
    年龄/岁 57.69±7.24 57.79±7.96 58.04±8.13 0.352 0.703
    性别/例 0.033 0.855
      男 61 61 38
      女 37 40 23
    糖尿病史/例(%) - 32(31.68) 26(42.62) 1.980 0.159
    高血压史/例(%) - 39(38.61) 28(45.90) 0.833 0.361
    高脂血症史/例(%) - 31(30.69) 25(40.98) 1.781 0.182
    心肌罪犯血管数量(1支/多支) - 65/36 28/33 5.297 0.021
    RBC/(×1012/L) 4.18±0.63 4.15±0.71 4.20±0.59 0.150 0.861
    WBC/(×109/L) 5.08±0.72 5.12±0.75 5.05±0.68 0.237 0.789
    PLT/(×109/L) 161.53±32.07 157.71±34.11 155.94±31.58 0.737 0.479
    FPG/(mmol/L) 5.03±0.62 5.91±1.281) 6.08±1.351) 24.129 <0.001
    TC/(mmol/L) 3.07±0.58 4.69±0.911) 5.01±1.121)2) 131.695 <0.001
    TG/(mmol/L) 1.18±0.29 1.51±0.351) 1.67±0.411)2) 48.439 <0.001
    HDL-C/(mmol/L) 1.31±0.22 0.92±0.151) 0.77±0.131)2) 255.975 <0.001
    LDL-C/(mmol/L) 2.24±0.53 3.29±0.741) 3.41±0.771) 85.476 <0.001
    CK-MB/(μg/L) 2.35±0.48 33.86±5.291) 46.79±6.151)2) 2200.551 <0.001
    Hcy/(μmol/L) 7.19±0.85 20.14±3.711) 29.53±5.091)2) 908.976 <0.001
    cTnI/(μg/L) 0.11±0.02 3.98±0.531) 4.77±0.681)2) 4293.607 <0.001
    LVEF/% 61.17±5.08 41.09±5.131) 36.53±6.771)2) 517.365 <0.001
    Ang-2/(mg/L) 1.03±0.22 2.14±0.461) 2.79±0.551)2) 295.706 <0.001
    IFABP/(ng/L) 298.62±48.71 417.35±70.621) 596.53±81.801)2) 233.518 <0.001
    与对照组比较,1)P<0.05;与非CS组比较,2)P<0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  生存组和死亡组临床资料、实验室指标及血清Ang-2、IFABP水平的比较 X±S

    组别 生存组(34例) 死亡组(27例) t/χ2 P
    年龄/岁 57.98±7.83 58.12±8.51 0.067 0.947
    性别/例 0.009 0.924
      男 21 10
      女 13 17
    糖尿病史/例(%) 10(29.41) 16(59.26) 5.482 0.019
    高血压史/例(%) 14(41.18) 14(51.85) 0.691 0.406
    高脂血症史/例(%) 10(29.41) 15(55.56) 4.253 0.039
    心肌罪犯血管数量(1支/多支) 20/14 8/19 5.165 0.023
    RBC/(×1012/L) 4.17±0.57 4.24±0.62 0.458 0.648
    WBC/(×109/L) 5.10±0.71 4.99±0.64 0.628 0.533
    PLT/(×109/L) 158.66±32.41 152.51±30.53 0.755 0.453
    FPG/(mmol/L) 5.11±1.25 7.30±1.48 6.264 <0.001
    TC/(mmol/L) 4.25±0.98 5.97±1.30 5.893 <0.001
    TG/(mmol/L) 1.50±0.38 1.88±0.45 3.575 0.001
    HDL-C/(mmol/L) 0.85±0.16 0.67±0.09 5.221 <0.001
    LDL-C/(mmol/L) 3.04±0.69 3.88±0.87 4.207 <0.001
    CK-MB/(μg/L) 39.82±5.97 55.57±6.38 9.928 <0.001
    Hcy/(μmol/L) 25.61±4.42 34.47±5.93 6.686 <0.001
    cTnI/(μg/L) 4.36±0.61 5.29±0.77 5.266 <0.001
    LVEF/% 38.59±6.94 33.94±6.56 2.662 0.01
    Ang-2/(mg/L) 2.29±0.43 3.42±0.70 7.757 <0.001
    IFABP/(ng/L) 522.26±79.89 690.06±84.21 7.957 <0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  STEMI并发CS患者血清Ang-2、IFABP与临床资料、实验室指标的相关性分析

    指标 Ang-2 IFABP
    r P r P
    IFABP 0.429 <0.001 - -
    糖尿病史 0.539 <0.001 0.545 <0.001
    高脂血症史 0.498 <0.001 0.509 <0.001
    心肌罪犯血管数量 0.524 <0.001 0.571 <0.001
    FPG 0.446 <0.001 0.492 <0.001
    TC 0.512 <0.001 0.536 <0.001
    TG 0.483 <0.001 0.507 <0.001
    HDL-C -0.463 <0.001 -0.518 <0.001
    LDL-C 0.515 <0.001 0.564 <0.001
    CK-MB 0.601 <0.001 0.627 <0.001
    Hcy 0.582 <0.001 0.594 <0.001
    cTnI 0.533 <0.001 0.579 <0.001
    LVEF -0.568 <0.001 -0.624 <0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  Cox回归分析STEMI并发CS患者入院后28 d内生存的影响因素

    自变量 β SE Wald P HR 95%CI
    糖尿病史 0.816 0.294 7.703 0.006 2.261 1.271~4.024
    高脂血症史 0.729 0.305 5.713 0.017 2.073 1.140~3.769
    心肌罪犯血管数量 0.856 0.313 7.479 0.006 2.354 1.274~4.347
    FPG 0.652 0.283 5.308 0.021 1.919 1.102~3.342
    TC 0.705 0.261 7.296 0.007 2.024 1.213~3.376
    TG 0.853 0.314 7.380 0.007 2.347 1.268~4.342
    HDL-C -0.758 0.255 8.836 0.003 0.469 0.284~0.772
    LDL-C 0.902 0.324 7.750 0.005 2.465 1.306~4.651
    CK-MB 0.849 0.338 6.309 0.012 2.337 1.205~4.533
    Hcy 0.698 0.217 10.346 0.001 2.010 1.313~3.075
    cTnI 0.917 0.233 15.489 <0.001 2.502 1.585~3.950
    LVEF -0.886 0.264 11.263 0.001 0.412 0.246~0.692
    Ang-2 0.857 0.279 9.435 0.002 2.356 1.364~4.071
    IFABP 0.911 0.325 7.857 0.005 2.487 1.315~4.702
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 5  血清Ang-2、IFABP预测STEMI并发CS患者入院后28 d内生存的价值

    指标 截断值 AUC 95%CI 灵敏度/% 特异度/% 约登指数
    Ang-2 2.81 mg/L 0.741 0.629~0.838 60.92 77.58 0.385
    IFABP 602.38 ng/L 0.759 0.660~0.849 63.14 72.39 0.355
    二者联合 - 0.836 0.728~0.911 81.78 70.26 0.520
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    陈振飞, 方曹阳, 张静, 等. 血清YKL-40联合CHA2DS2-VASc-HSF评分在急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死诊断中的价值[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2022, 38(8): 643-648. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCXB202208015.htm

    [2]

    张同昌, 李海山, 陈敏, 等. 血浆致动脉硬化指数评价急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的临床价值[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2023, 24(7): 359-363. https://lcjz.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2023.07.005

    [3]

    Sato R, Hasegawa D, Guo SC, et al. Temporary mechanical circulatory support in sepsis-associated cardiogenic shock with and without acute myocardial infarction[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2024, 38(1): 207-213. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.09.026

    [4]

    Kunkel KJ, Fuller B, Basir MB. Management of Cardiogenic Shock in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction[J]. Interv Cardiol Clin, 2021, 10(3): 345-357.

    [5]

    Khosraviani N, Wu R, Fish JE. Angiopoietin-2: An Emerging Tie to Pathological Vessel Enlargement[J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2022, 42(1): 3-5. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.121.317102

    [6]

    Skowerski T, Nabrdalik K, Kwiendacz H, et al. Angiopoietin-2 as a biomarker of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with or without type 2 diabetes[J]. Arch Med Sci, 2019, 18(3): 624-631.

    [7]

    Wu C, Zhu X, Ren H, et al. Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein as a biomarker for the diagnosis of strangulated intestinal obstruction: A meta-analysis[J]. Open Med (Wars), 2021, 16(1): 264-273. doi: 10.1515/med-2021-0214

    [8]

    Kastl SP, Krychtiuk KA, Lenz M, et al. Intestinal Fatty Acid Binding Protein is Associated With Mortality in Patients With Acute Heart Failure or Cardiogenic Shock[J]. Shock, 2019, 51(4): 410-415. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001195

    [9]

    中华医学会心血管病学分会, 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南(2019)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2019, 47(10): 766-783. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJXB201709002.htm

    [10]

    Vahdatpour C, Collins D, Goldberg S. Cardiogenic Shock[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2019, 8(8): e011991. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.011991

    [11]

    Nishihira K, Honda S, Takegami M, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock in a super-aging society[J]. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 2023, 12(12): 847-855. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuad113

    [12]

    Wang Y, Fang J, Niu T, et al. Serum Ang-1/Ang-2 ratio may be a promising biomarker for evaluating severity of diabetic retinopathy[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2023, 261(1): 49-55. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05745-z

    [13]

    Chen SM, Li D, Xing X, et al. Higher serum angiopoietin 2 levels are independently associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with angina in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2020, 133(14): 1662-1668. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000812

    [14]

    Ranjbar K. Improved Cardiac Function Following Ischemia Reperfusion Injury Using Exercise Preconditioning and L-Arginine Supplementation via Oxidative Stress Mitigation and Angiogenesis Amelioration[J]. Cardiovasc Toxicol, 2022, 22(8): 736-745. doi: 10.1007/s12012-022-09752-8

    [15]

    蒋玲, 邱实, 陈丽梅, 等. 血清Ang-2、cTnI和NT-proBNP联合检测在急性冠状动脉综合征诊断及预后评估中的价值[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2022, 19(6): 749-754. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2022.06.008

    [16]

    Huang L, Bichsel C, Norris AL, et al. Endothelial GNAQ p. R183Q Increases ANGPT2 (Angiopoietin-2) and Drives Formation of Enlarged Blood Vessels[J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2022, 42(1): 27-43.

    [17]

    Joussen AM, Ricci F, Paris LP, et al. Angiopoietin/Tie2 signalling and its role in retinal and choroidal vascular diseases: a review of preclinical data[J]. Eye (Lond), 2021, 35(5): 1305-1316. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-01377-x

    [18]

    Fleischer LT, Ballester L, Dutt M, et al. Evaluation of galectin-3 and intestinal fatty acid binding protein as serum biomarkers in autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease[J]. J Nephrol, 2023, 36(1): 133-145.

    [19]

    Zenger S, Demir Piroǧlu I, Çevik A, et al. The importance of serum intestinal fatty acid-binding protein for the early diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia[J]. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 2021, 27(3): 278-283.

    [20]

    Sekino M, Funaoka H, Sato S, et al. Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein level as a predictor of 28-day mortality and bowel ischemia in patients with septic shock: A preliminary study[J]. J Crit Care, 2017, 42(1): 92-100.

    [21]

    Huang X, Zhou Y, Sun Y, et al. Intestinal fatty acid binding protein: A rising therapeutic target in lipid metabolism[J]. Prog Lipid Res, 2022, 87(1): 101178.

    [22]

    Strang SG, Habes QLM, Van der Hoven B, et al. Intestinal fatty acid binding protein as a predictor for intra-abdominal pressure-related complications in patients admitted to the intensive care unit; a prospective cohort study (Ⅰ-Fabulous study)[J]. J Crit Care, 2021, 63(1): 211-217.

  • 加载中

(1)

(5)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  532
  • PDF下载数:  76
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2024-03-20
刊出日期:  2024-07-10

目录