中性粒细胞计数与淋巴细胞和血小板计数比值联合血乳酸对多发伤患者并发AKI预测价值研究

杨国龙, 黄福明, 侯锋. 中性粒细胞计数与淋巴细胞和血小板计数比值联合血乳酸对多发伤患者并发AKI预测价值研究[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2024, 25(7): 352-356. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2024.07.006
引用本文: 杨国龙, 黄福明, 侯锋. 中性粒细胞计数与淋巴细胞和血小板计数比值联合血乳酸对多发伤患者并发AKI预测价值研究[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2024, 25(7): 352-356. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2024.07.006
YANG Guolong, HUANG Fuming, HOU Feng. The value of the ratio of neutrophil count to lymphocyte count and platelet count combined with blood lactic acid in predicting AKI in patients with multiple injuries[J]. J Clin Emerg, 2024, 25(7): 352-356. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2024.07.006
Citation: YANG Guolong, HUANG Fuming, HOU Feng. The value of the ratio of neutrophil count to lymphocyte count and platelet count combined with blood lactic acid in predicting AKI in patients with multiple injuries[J]. J Clin Emerg, 2024, 25(7): 352-356. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2024.07.006

中性粒细胞计数与淋巴细胞和血小板计数比值联合血乳酸对多发伤患者并发AKI预测价值研究

  • 基金项目:
    广西重点研发计划项目(No:桂科AB23026019)
详细信息

The value of the ratio of neutrophil count to lymphocyte count and platelet count combined with blood lactic acid in predicting AKI in patients with multiple injuries

More Information
  • 目的 探讨中性粒细胞计数与淋巴细胞和血小板计数比值(N/LPR)联合血乳酸对多发伤患者并发急性肾功能损伤(acute kidney injury,AKI)的预测价值。方法 回顾性分析2021年2月—2023年10月南宁市第八人民医院急诊科收治的87例重型多发伤患者临床资料,根据患者住院期间是否发生AKI,分为AKI组及非AKI组,对比两组患者入院时创伤严重度评分、中性粒细胞计数、淋巴细胞计数、血小板计数、血清乳酸等指标,采用logistic回归筛选患者发生AKI的影响因素,ROC曲线分析N/LPR、血乳酸及两者联合对AKI发生的预测价值。结果 治疗前两组患者年龄、性别、合并疾病、入院白细胞计数、血红蛋白计数、血清肌酐进行比较,均差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);AKI组ISS评分、N/LPR、血乳酸、C反应蛋白高于非AKI组,差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.05);入院平均动脉压低于非AKI组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);logistics回归分析显示,N/LPR和血乳酸是多发伤患者发生AKI的独立危险因素(P < 0.05);ROC分析显示,以N/LPR>9.06判断多发伤患者发生AKI的灵敏度为86.7%,特异度为62.9%,曲线下面积为0.726;以血乳酸>2.58 mmol/L判断多发伤患者发生AKI的灵敏度为90.7%,特异度为54.2%,曲线下面积为0.738;两者联合,判断多发伤患者发生AKI的灵敏度为86.7%,特异度为73.6%,曲线下面积为0.869。结论 N/LPR和血乳酸升高是影响多发伤患者发生AKI的独立危险因素,N/LPR和血乳酸可有效预测多发伤患者并发AKI,对临床预防和治疗AKI发生具有重要临床意义。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  N/LPR和Lac预测多发伤患者发生AKI的ROC曲线

    表 1  两组患者一般资料比较 X±S

    项目 AKI组(15例) 非AKI组(72例) χ2/T/U P
    年龄/岁 44.85±12.55 45.67±13.41 -0.882 0.380
    性别/例 1.000
      男 12 54
      女 3 18
    糖尿病/例(%) 2(13.33) 4(7.41) 0.275
    高血压病/例(%) 1(6.67) 3(4.17) 0.538
    ISS评分/分 36.12±1.84 34.76±2.41 2.050 0.043
    入院平均动脉压/mmHg 74.22±7.80 81.01±11.78 -2.781 0.009
    入院WBC/(×109/L) 13.55±2.91 13.06±2.16 0.628 0.538
    入院N/(×109/L) 14.39±2.19 13.45±1.96 1.663 0.100
    入院L/(×109/L) 0.82±0.17 0.91±0.17 -1.768 0.081
    入院PLT/(×109/L) 157.37±25.73 171.49±27.43 -1.831 0.071
    入院Lac/(mmol/L) 3.02(2.88,3.19) 2.51(2.17,3.04) 0.004
    入院N/LPR 10.72(9.39,13.62) 8.68(7.33,8.68) 0.006
    入院CRP/(mg/L) 17.12±4.11 15.45±2.61 1.514 0.046
    入院Hb/(g/L) 97.06±5.96 94.81±5.78 1.370 0.174
    入院SCr/(mol/L) 55.63±7.46 54.08±8.77 0.636 0.527
    注:1 mmHg=0.133 kPa。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  AKI危险因素二元logistic回归分析

    影响因素 β SE Waldχ2 EXP(B) P 95%CI
    入院Lac 1.981 0.869 5.196 7.252 0.023 1.320~39.834
    入院N/LPR 2.736 1.403 3.975 9.349 0.046 1.471~41.807
    入院CRP 0.128 0.109 1.383 1.136 0.240 0.918~1.406
    入院平均动脉压 -0.059 0.036 2.680 0.942 0.102 0.878~1.012
    ISS评分 0.261 0.173 2.275 1.299 0.131 0.925~1.824
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    张翔, 袁乙铜, 何静, 等. 创伤院前救护能力现状及延时现场救护知识和能力准备-多中心横断面调研[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2023, 25(3): 216-222. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4237.2023.03.010

    [2]

    中国县域创伤救治体系建设标准专家共识专家组. 中国县域创伤救治体系建设标准专家共识(2024年版)[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2024, 44(1): 6-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20230908-00149

    [3]

    池锐彬, 李超锋, 邹启明, 等. 重症创伤患者急性肾损伤的临床特征及危险因素分析[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2022, 31(12): 1691-1696. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2022.12.021

    [4]

    刘大东, 虞宗颖, 张德厚, 等. 外周血中性粒细胞计数与淋巴细胞和血小板计数比值对脓毒症患者28 d死亡的预测价值[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2021, 33(1): 33-37. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200727-00545

    [5]

    Duque-Santana V, López-Campos F, Martin-Martin M, et al. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Prognostic Factors in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer[J]. Oncology, 2023, 101(6): 349-357. doi: 10.1159/000526450

    [6]

    龚春蕾, 蒋远霞, 唐艳, 等. 血乳酸升高是脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤发生及死亡的独立危险因素[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2022, 34(7): 714-720. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210823-01238

    [7]

    Messerer DAC, Halbgebauer R, Nilsson B, et al. Immunopathophysiology of trauma-related acute kidney injury[J]. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2021, 17(2): 91-111. doi: 10.1038/s41581-020-00344-9

    [8]

    中华医学会创伤学分会创伤急救与多发伤学组. 多发伤病历与诊断: 专家共识意见(2013版)[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2014, 16(2): 192-193. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XIBU202309002.htm

    [9]

    Cullough PA, Shaw AD, Haase M, et al. Diagnosis of acute kidney injuryusing functional and injury biomarkers: Workgroup statements from the tenth Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative Consensus Conference[J]. Contrih Nephrol, 2013, 182: 13-29.

    [10]

    Gameiro J, Fonseca JA, Jorge S, et al. Neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet ratio as a predictor of mortality in septic-acute kidney injury patients[J]. Nefrologia (Engl Ed), 2020, 40(4): 461-468. doi: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2020.09.001

    [11]

    Mortaz E, Zadian SS, Shahir M, et al. Does Neutrophil Phenotype Predict the Survival of Trauma Patients?[J]. Front Immunol, 2019, 10: 2122. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02122

    [12]

    晁晟, 贾磊, 熊建斌, 等. 血乳酸及乳酸清除率与多发伤失血性休克患者急性肾损伤的关系[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2023, 43(2): 348-351. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLXZ202302026.htm

    [13]

    Uchino S, Kellum JA, Bellomo R, et al. Beginning and Ending Supportive Therapy for the Kidney (BEST Kidney) Investigators. Acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study[J]. JAMA, 2005, 17, 294(7): 813-818.

    [14]

    孙涛, 陶志华. 急性肾损伤标志物应用价值: 现状与未来[J]. 中华检验医学杂志, 2022, 45(7): 671-676. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114452-20211223-00791

    [15]

    Dehouche N. The injury severity score: an operations perspective[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2022, 22(1): 48. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01528-6

    [16]

    韩圣瑾, 周正武, 翁云龙, 等. 碳酸氢钠林格液联合连续性肾脏替代疗法对创伤合并急性肾损伤患者炎症水平及肾功能的影响[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(5): 376-381. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2023.05.005

    [17]

    Leng J, Zhao W, Guo J, et al. E-prostanoid 3 receptor deficiency on myeloid cells protects against ischemic acute kidney injury via breaking the auto-amplification loop of necroinflammation[J]. Kidney Int, 2023, 103(1): 100-114. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.08.019

    [18]

    anicova A, Becker N, Xu B, et al. Severe Traumatic Injury Induces Phenotypic and Functional Changes of Neutrophils and Monocytes[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(18): 4139. doi: 10.3390/jcm10184139

    [19]

    Junger WG, Rhind SG, Rizoli SB, et al. Resuscitation of traumatic hemorrhagic shock patients with hypertonic saline-without dextran-inhibits neutrophil and endothelial cell activation[J]. Shock, 2012, 38: 341-350. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3182635aca

    [20]

    Groeneveld KM, Koenderman L, Warren BL, et al. Early decreased neutrophil responsiveness is related to late onset sepsis in multitrauma patients: an international cohort study[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(6): e0180145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180145

    [21]

    张波, 范家伟, 康超, 等. 成年急性创伤性休克患者预后预测因素分析[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2022, 38(4): 365-370.

    [22]

    郭辅政, 赵秀娟, 邓玖旭, 等. 严重创伤患者早期外周血淋巴细胞变化与预后之间的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 552-556. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BYDB202203023.htm

    [23]

    Koupenova M, Livada AC, Morrell CN. Platelet and Megakaryocyte Roles in Innate and Adaptive Immunity[J]. Circ Res, 2022, 130(2): 288-308.

  • 加载中

(1)

(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  458
  • PDF下载数:  165
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2024-04-23
刊出日期:  2024-07-10

目录