离子钙水平联合乳酸清除率对心肺复苏后患者近期预后的评估

邹洋洋, 姚莉. 离子钙水平联合乳酸清除率对心肺复苏后患者近期预后的评估[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2023, 24(11): 573-577. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2023.11.004
引用本文: 邹洋洋, 姚莉. 离子钙水平联合乳酸清除率对心肺复苏后患者近期预后的评估[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2023, 24(11): 573-577. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2023.11.004
ZOU Yangyang, YAO Li. Assessment of ionized calcium levels combined with lactate clearance for the immediate prognosis of patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation[J]. J Clin Emerg, 2023, 24(11): 573-577. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2023.11.004
Citation: ZOU Yangyang, YAO Li. Assessment of ionized calcium levels combined with lactate clearance for the immediate prognosis of patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation[J]. J Clin Emerg, 2023, 24(11): 573-577. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2023.11.004

离子钙水平联合乳酸清除率对心肺复苏后患者近期预后的评估

  • 基金项目:
    合肥市第二人民医院院级课题(No:2021ygkt43)
详细信息

Assessment of ionized calcium levels combined with lactate clearance for the immediate prognosis of patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation

More Information
  • 目的 探讨心肺复苏(cardiopulmonary resuscitation,CPR)后患者早期采用动脉离子钙(ionized calcium,iCa)水平联合乳酸清除率对其近期预后的评估价值。方法 回顾性分析合肥市第二人民医院重症医学2018年6月—2020年6月收治的CPR后患者临床资料,包括既往基础疾病、肾上腺素用量、初始乳酸值、iCa水平、乳酸清除率、APACHEⅡ评分,根据CPR后7 d的转归将患者分为存活组和死亡组。采用t/χ2检验比较两组各指标之间差异,并通过建立logistic回归方法分析其与预后的关系,绘制受试者工作曲线(receiver operating curve,ROC)分析对患者预后的判断价值。结果 共纳入121例患者,存活组有43例(35.5%),死亡组有78例(64.5%);两组的既往疾病、肾上腺素用量、初始乳酸值比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);年龄、入院APACHE Ⅱ评分、iCa及6 h乳酸清除率比较,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05);多因素logistic回归分析显示,APACHEⅡ评分(OR=0.745,95%CI:0.648~0.856)、乳酸清除率(OR=1.100,95%CI:1.050~1.152)、iCa水平(OR=9.184,95%CI:3.196~26.391)是CPR后患者7 d病死率的独立预测因素(均P<0.05)。iCa、乳酸清除率以及联合两者与APACHEⅡ评分预测概率的曲线下面积分别为0.735(95%CI:0.646~0.827)、0.709(95%CI:0.606~0.811)、0.832(95%CI:0.755~0.910)、0.832(95%CI:0.754~0.910)。结论 iCa水平联合6 h乳酸清除率对CPR后患者近期预后(7 d病死率)具有良好的预测价值。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  iCa、乳酸清除率、APACHEⅡ及联合指标预测心肺复苏后患者7 d病死率的ROC曲线

    表 1  不同预后患者相关影响指标比较 X±S

    影响因素 存活组(43例) 死亡组(78例) t/χ2 P
    男性/例(%) 24(55.8) 46(59.0) 0.114 0.736
    年龄/岁 61.23±10.76 68.71±12.79 3.248 0.002
    既往疾病/例(%)
      糖尿病 12(27.9) 19(24.4) 0.183 0.669
      高血压 16(37.2) 23(29.5) 0.757 0.384
      冠状动脉疾病 12(27.9) 25(32.1) 0.224 0.636
      肺气肿 10(23.3) 15(19.2) 0.274 0.601
    肾上腺素≤5 mg/例(%) 18(41.9) 36(46.2) 0.207 0.650
    APACHEⅡ评分 19.79±5.34 26.21±4.74 6.808 <0.001
    初始乳酸值/(mmol/L) 9.45±3.12 9.67±3.65 0.334 0.739
    乳酸清除率/% 59.71±17.24 47.03±13.30 -4.510 <0.001
    iCa/(mg/dL) 4.82±0.83 4.10±0.75 -4.878 <0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  logistic回归分析心肺复苏后患者7 d病死率的独立预测因素

    影响因素 OR 95%CI Z P
    年龄 0.960 0.905~1.018 -1.37 0.170
    APACHE Ⅱ评分 0.745 0.648~0.856 -4.15 <0.001
    乳酸清除率 1.100 1.050~1.152 4.05 <0.001
    iCa 9.184 3.196~26.391 4.12 <0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  iCa、乳酸清除率、APACHEⅡ及联合对心肺复苏后患者近期预后的评估

    影响因素 AUC 标准误 界值 95%CI 灵敏度/% 特异度/%
    APACHEⅡ评分 0.832 0.040 23 0.754~0.910 69.77 88.46
    乳酸清除率 0.709 0.052 60.78 0.606~0.811 51.16 87.18
    iCa 0.735 0.046 4.48 0.646~0.827 67.44 70.51
    iCa+乳酸清除率 0.832 0.390 - 0.755~0.910 79.07 76.92
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    中国研究型医院学会心肺复苏学专业委员会. 2016中国心肺复苏专家共识[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2016, 28(12): 1059-1079. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJJY202308002.htm

    [2]

    Nolan JP, Neumar RW, Adrie C, et al. Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication. A Scientific Statement from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation; the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee; the Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative, and Critical Care; the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Council on Stroke[J]. Resuscitation, 2008, 79(3): 350-379. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.09.017

    [3]

    靳贝贝. 心肺复苏后机体免疫功能的变化[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2022, 23(11): 759-763. https://lcjz.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2022.11.004

    [4]

    晁晟, 贾磊, 熊建斌, 等. 血乳酸及乳酸清除率与多发伤失血性休克患者急性肾损伤的关系[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2023, 43(2): 348-351. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLXZ202302026.htm

    [5]

    洪欢, 彭松, 张琳. 早期乳酸清除率对脓毒症患者预后的评估[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2016, 17(12): 930-931, 934. https://lcjz.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2016.12.009

    [6]

    Sanaie S, Mahmoodpoor A, Hamishehkar H, et al. Association between disease severity and calcium concentration in critically Ill patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit[J]. Anesth Pain Med, 2018, 8(1): e57583.

    [7]

    宋维, 刘元税, 吴世畅, 等. 海南省多中心心肺复苏Utstien模式注册研究[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2011, 20(9): 904-910. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2011.09.002

    [8]

    中华医学会急诊医学分会复苏学组, 中国医药教育协会急诊专业委员会, 成人心脏骤停后综合征诊断和治疗中国急诊专家共识组. 成人心脏骤停后综合征诊断和治疗中国急诊专家共识[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2021, 30(07): 799-808. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJJY202107010.htm

    [9]

    Dalessio L. Post-cardiac arrest syndrome[J]. AACN Adv Crit Care, 2020, 31(4): 383-393.

    [10]

    Kleinman ME, Brennan EE, Goldberger ZD, et al. Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care[J]. Circulation, 2015, 132(18 Suppl 2): S414-S435.

    [11]

    Walker AC, Johnson NJ. Critical care of the post-cardiac arrest patient[J]. Cardiol Clin, 2018, 36(3): 419-428.

    [12]

    相前, 李缨, 宣琪, 等. 脓毒症患者血钙的影响因素及对预后的影响[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2018, 41(8): 710-713. https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10403-1023542644.htm

    [13]

    Steele T, Kolamunnage-Dona R, Downey C, et al. Assessment and clinical course of hypocalcemia in critical illness[J]. Crit Care, 2013, 17(3): R106.

    [14]

    Helsloot D, Fitzgerald M, Lefering R, et al. Trauma-induced disturbances in ionized calcium levels correlate parabolically with coagulopathy, transfusion, and mortality: a multicentre cohort analysis from the TraumaRegister DGU®[J]. Crit Care, 2023, 27(1): 267.

    [15]

    Liu Y, Chai Y, Rong Z, et al. Prognostic value of ionized calcium levels in neonatal sepsis[J]. Ann Nutr Metab, 2020, 76(3): 193-200.

    [16]

    Kim SJ, Kim HS, Hwang SO, et al. Ionized calcium level at emergency department arrival is associated with return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(10): e0240420.

    [17]

    钱际银, 张云, 邓淑坤, 等. 严重高乳酸血症患者的临床特征及预后分析[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2021, 22(6): 383-389. https://lcjz.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2021.06.004

    [18]

    张健峰, 顾晓蕾, 李斌, 等. 血乳酸联合qSOFA评分对早期筛选诊断脓毒症患者的价值[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2021, 22(5): 344-347. https://lcjz.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2021.05.011

    [19]

    李兴华, 刘颖, 吕艳超. 脓毒血症患者乳酸清除率、红细胞分布宽度和血乳酸水平及与预后的关系[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2020, 30(12): 22-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXDY202012005.htm

    [20]

    顾伟, 李春盛. 心脏骤停后综合征——类脓毒症样综合征[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2019, 28(1): 121-123.

    [21]

    Hayashida K, Suzuki M, Yonemoto N, et al. Early lactate clearance is associated with improved outcomes in patients with postcardiac arrest syndrome: A Prospective, Multicenter Observational Study(SOS-KANTO 2012 Study)[J]. Crit Care Med, 2017, 45(6): e559-e566.

    [22]

    Brux H, Vom Dahl J, Haake H. Lactate Level and Clearance as Predictors of Neurologic Outcome After Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation[J]. Am J Crit Care, 2023, 32(2): 81-91.

  • 加载中

(1)

(3)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  702
  • PDF下载数:  142
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2023-08-10
刊出日期:  2023-11-10

目录