MASP家族表达水平与脓毒症患者不良预后风险的相关性

冼丽娜, 邓小彦, 陈伟. MASP家族表达水平与脓毒症患者不良预后风险的相关性[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2024, 25(1): 19-23. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2024.01.004
引用本文: 冼丽娜, 邓小彦, 陈伟. MASP家族表达水平与脓毒症患者不良预后风险的相关性[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2024, 25(1): 19-23. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2024.01.004
XIAN Lina, DENG Xiaoyan, CHEN Wei. Correlation between MASP family expression levels and risk of poor prognosis in patients with sepsis[J]. J Clin Emerg, 2024, 25(1): 19-23. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2024.01.004
Citation: XIAN Lina, DENG Xiaoyan, CHEN Wei. Correlation between MASP family expression levels and risk of poor prognosis in patients with sepsis[J]. J Clin Emerg, 2024, 25(1): 19-23. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2024.01.004

MASP家族表达水平与脓毒症患者不良预后风险的相关性

  • 基金项目:
    海南省卫生健康行业科研项目(No:21A200050)
详细信息

Correlation between MASP family expression levels and risk of poor prognosis in patients with sepsis

More Information
  • 目的 对甘露聚糖结合凝集素相关丝氨酸蛋白酶(mannan-binding lectin associated serine proteases,MASP)家族表达水平与脓毒症患者预后风险的相关性进行分析。方法 将2018年1月—2022年12月于海南医学院第一附属医院诊治的113例脓毒症患者纳入研究,所有患者入院后均予补液、抗感染等规范化治疗,根据患者纳入研究28 d内是否死亡,将患者分为死亡组及存活组,比较两组患者一般临床资料及实验室指标,采用多因素logistic回归模型分析影响患者预后的因素,并对MASP家族表达水平与急性生理与慢性健康评分(acute physiology and chronic health evaluation,APACHE Ⅱ)评分相关性进行分析。结果 死亡组患者APACHE Ⅱ评分[(27.17±2.89)分]、白细胞[(15.34±2.11)×109/L]、超敏C反应蛋白[(26.19±3.87)mg/L]、MASP-1[(4 076.48±114.78)ng/L]、MASP-2[(58.75±6.31)ng/L]及MASP-3[(349.86±61.37)ng/L]水平显著高于存活组[(25.51±2.36)分,(14.23±1.64)×109/L,(28.36±3.92)mg/L,(3 848.65±89.24)ng/L,(48.22±3.54)ng/L,(216.93±54.74)ng/L],差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.05);白蛋白水平[(20.34±2.34)g/L]显著低于存活组[(24.78±2.61)g/L],差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001);多因素logistic回归分析示,高MASP-1水平(OR=1.019,P=0.019,95%CI:1.003~1.036)、MASP-2(OR=1.557,P=0.019,95%CI:1.078~2.306)及MASP-3(OR=1.033,P=0.047,95%CI:1.000~1.066)水平是影响患者预后的独立危险因素;Peason相关分析示:MASP-1、MASP-2及MASP-3水平与APACHE Ⅱ评分呈正相关(R=0.792,0.763,0.511,均P < 0.001)。结论 MASP家族表达水平升高与脓毒症患者不良预后呈显著正相关。
  • 加载中
  • 表 1  两组患者基线资料的比较 X±S

    一般资料 死亡组(34例) 存活组(79例) t/χ2 P
    年龄/岁 61.83±3.47 60.62±3.21 1.793 0.076
    性别/例(%) 0.272 0.602
      男 22(64.71) 47(59.49)
      女 12(35.29) 32(40.51)
    BMI/(kg/m2) 22.29±2.86 22.76±2.91 0.791 0.430
    感染部位/例(%) 2.105 0.551
      呼吸系统 9(26.47) 25(31.65)
      泌尿系统 4(11.76) 7(8.86)
      消化系统 15(44.12) 32(40.51)
      其他 6(17.65) 15(18.99)
    基础疾病/例(%)
      糖尿病 2(5.88) 4(5.06) 0.032 0.859
      慢性阻塞性肺疾病 1(2.94) 1(1.27) 0.384 0.536
      慢性肾脏病 1(2.94) 2(2.53) 0.015 0.901
      脑梗死 2(5.88) 5(6.33) 0.008 0.928
      高血压 1(2.94) 2(2.53) 0.015 0.901
      心力衰竭 3(8.82) 8(10.13) 0.046 0.830
      冠心病 4(11.76) 12(15.19) 0.229 0.632
    APACHE Ⅱ评分/分 27.17±2.89 25.51±2.36 3.200 0.002
    机械通气/例(%) 28(82.34) 54(68.35) 2.340 0.126
    WBC/(×109/L) 15.34±2.11 14.23±1.64 3.699 < 0.001
    PLT/(×109/L) 145.14±16.72 151.21±20.58 1.517 0.132
    ALB/(g/L) 20.34±2.34 24.78±2.61 8.547 < 0.001
    Scr/(μmol/L) 103.38±12.67 107.53±14.27 1.465 0.146
    hs-CRP/(mg/L) 26.19±3.87 28.36±3.92 2.709 0.008
    MASP-1/(ng/L) 4 076.48±114.78 3 848.65±89.24 11.389 < 0.001
    MASP-2/(ng/L) 58.75±6.31 48.22±3.54 11.299 < 0.001
    MASP-3/(ng/L) 349.86±61.37 216.93±54.74 11.411 < 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  影响患者预后的多因素logistic回归分析

    变量 β SE Wald P OR 95%CI
    APACHE Ⅱ评分 0.191 0.242 0.619 0.431 1.210 0.752~1.946
    WBC 0.040 0.346 0.013 0.908 0.961 0.488~1.892
    ALB 0.286 0.207 1.913 0.167 0.751 0.501~1.127
    hs-CRP 0.039 0.167 0.054 0.816 0.962 0.693~1.334
    MASP-1 0.019 0.008 5.537 0.019 1.019 1.003~1.036
    MASP-2 0.456 0.194 5.521 0.019 1.577 1.078~2.306
    MASP-3 0.032 0.016 3.947 0.047 1.033 1.000~1.066
    注:以预后为自变量,1=死亡;0=存活;因变量为APACHE Ⅱ评分、WBC、ALB、hs-CRP、MASP-1、MASP-2、MASP-3均为连续变量。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  MASP家族表达水平与APACHE Ⅱ评分的相关性分析

    MASP家族 APACHE Ⅱ
    R P
    MASP-1 0.792 < 0.001
    MASP-2 0.763 < 0.001
    MASP-3 0.511 < 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Liu D, Huang SY, Sun JH, et al. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: mechanisms, diagnosis and current treatment options[J]. Mil Med Res, 2022, 9(1): 56.

    [2]

    Seymour CW, Kennedy JN, Wang S, et al. Derivation, Validation, and Potential Treatment Implications of Novel Clinical Phenotypes for Sepsis[J]. JAMA, 2019, 321(20): 2003-2017. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5791

    [3]

    Gavelli F, Castello LM, Avanzi GC. Management of sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department[J]. Intern Emerg Med, 2021, 16(6): 1649-1661. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02735-7

    [4]

    Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10219): 200-211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7

    [5]

    Pierrakos C, Velissaris D, Bisdorff M, et al. Biomarkers of sepsis: time for a reappraisal[J]. Crit Care, 2020, 24(1): 287. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02993-5

    [6]

    程少文, 陈扬平, 张安强, 等. MBL2与MASPs家族蛋白质相互作用的生物信息学分析[J]. 海南医学院学报, 2019, 25(15): 1121-1124, 1129.

    [7]

    Kristensen MK, Hansen MB, Madsen MB, et al. Complement Activation Is Associated With Mortality in Patients With Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infections-A Prospective Observational Study[J]. Front Immunol, 2020, 11: 17. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00017

    [8]

    曹钰, 柴艳芬, 邓颖, 等. 中国脓毒症/脓毒性休克急诊治疗指南(2018)[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2018, 19(9): 567-588. https://lcjz.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2018.09.001

    [9]

    Yan MY, Gustad LT, Nytro O. Sepsis prediction, early detection and identification using clinical text for machine learning: a systematic review[J]. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2022, 29(3): 559-575. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab236

    [10]

    Sinapidis D, Kosmas V, Vittoros V, et al. Progression into sepsis: an individualized process varying by the interaction of comorbidities with the underlying infection[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2018, 18(1): 242. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3156-z

    [11]

    Golomingi M, Kohler J, Jenny L, et al. Complement lectin pathway components MBL and MASP-1 promote haemostasis upon vessel injury in a microvascular bleeding model[J]. Front Immunol, 2022, 13: 948190. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.948190

    [12]

    李旭, 马晓春. 严重感染出凝血障碍的认识和处理[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2021, 41(6): 466-469, 474.

    [13]

    任晓庆, 李琪, 闫本纯, 等. MASP-1联合血栓分子标志物对脓毒症合并DIC的诊断价值[J]. 中国现代医药杂志, 2022, 24(4): 43-46.

    [14]

    Debreczeni ML, Németh Z, Kajdácsi E, et al. MASP-1 Increases Endothelial Permeability[J]. Front Immunol, 2019, 10: 991. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00991

    [15]

    Németh Z, Debreczeni ML, Kajdácsi E, et al. Cooperation of Complement MASP-1 with Other Proinflammatory Factors to Enhance the Activation of Endothelial Cells[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(11): 9181. doi: 10.3390/ijms24119181

    [16]

    王文, 郭璐, 余雪梅, 等. 营养状态和MASP-2基因多态性与COPD并发肺部感染的关联性[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2022, 32(4): 511-515.

    [17]

    Gao T, Zhu L, Liu H, et al. Highly pathogenic coronavirus N protein aggravates inflammation by MASP-2-mediated lectin complement pathway overactivation[J]. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2022, 7(1): 318. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01133-5

    [18]

    衣丽华, 董岩, 郑丽莎, 等. 血清MASP-3、MBL、SDMA对老年急性缺血性脑卒中的诊断价值[J]. 疑难病杂志, 2022, 21(5): 456-460, 474.

    [19]

    Rosbjerg A, Würzner R, Garred P, et al. MASP-1 and MASP-3 Bind Directly to Aspergillus fumigatus and Promote Complement Activation and Phagocytosis[J]. J Innate Immun, 2021, 13(4): 211-224. doi: 10.1159/000514546

    [20]

    郑林花, 张颖, 宋莎莎, 等. 血清MASP2、MASP3在IgA肾病中的作用[J]. 中国免疫学杂志, 2020, 36(1): 77-83.

    [21]

    Machida T, Hayashi M, Fujita T, et al. Response to Comment on Cutting Edge: Role of MASP-3 in the Physiological Activation of Factor D of the Alternative Complement Pathway[J]. J Immunol, 2019, 203(12): 3091-3092.

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  397
  • PDF下载数:  93
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2023-10-30
刊出日期:  2024-01-10

目录