脓毒症患者心肌损伤早期血清FABP3和GPBB表达水平及其临床意义研究

侯小龙, 岳伶俐, 孙自国, 等. 脓毒症患者心肌损伤早期血清FABP3和GPBB表达水平及其临床意义研究[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2021, 22(1): 36-41. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2021.01.008
引用本文: 侯小龙, 岳伶俐, 孙自国, 等. 脓毒症患者心肌损伤早期血清FABP3和GPBB表达水平及其临床意义研究[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2021, 22(1): 36-41. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2021.01.008
HOU Xiaolong, YUE Lingli, SUN Ziguo, et al. Expression of serum FABP3 and GPBB in children with sepsis-induced myocardial injury and its clinical significance[J]. J Clin Emerg, 2021, 22(1): 36-41. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2021.01.008
Citation: HOU Xiaolong, YUE Lingli, SUN Ziguo, et al. Expression of serum FABP3 and GPBB in children with sepsis-induced myocardial injury and its clinical significance[J]. J Clin Emerg, 2021, 22(1): 36-41. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2021.01.008

脓毒症患者心肌损伤早期血清FABP3和GPBB表达水平及其临床意义研究

详细信息
    通讯作者: 孙自国,E-mail:acttar@163.com
  • 中图分类号: R737.9

Expression of serum FABP3 and GPBB in children with sepsis-induced myocardial injury and its clinical significance

More Information
  • 目的:探讨血清心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白(fatty acid binding protein 3,FABP3)与糖原磷酸化酶同工酶脑型(glycogen phosphorylase isoenzyme BB,GPBB)在脓毒症患者心肌损伤中的表达水平及其临床意义。方法:对诊断为脓毒症的102例患者根据心肌损伤诊断标准分为非心肌损伤组(71例)和心肌损伤组(31例),并选取同期我院就诊非脓毒症感染患者24例为对照组。分别在脓毒症确诊后1 h、6 h和24 h比较3组患者血清FABP3、GPBB、心肌肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)、肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)和肌酸激酶(CK)的表达水平。应用Pearson相关分析法分析FABP3、GPBB与cTnI在不同时间点的相关性。绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),评价血清FABP3、GPBB和cTnI对心肌损伤的诊断价值。结果:脓毒症患者心肌损伤发生率为31.39%(31/102)。心肌损伤组患者LVEF值明显低于非心肌损伤组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。1 h时心肌损伤组患者血清FABP3、GPBB和CK-MB表达水平明显高于非心肌损伤组和对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。6 h和24 h时心肌损伤组患者血清FABP3、GPBB、cTnI、CK和CK-MB表达水平均明显高于非心肌损伤组和对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。1 h时FABP3、GPBB与cTnI无相关性(r分别为0.206,0.234,P>0.05)。6 h时FABP3、GPBB与cTnI呈正相关性(r分别为0.505,0.419,P<0.05)。24 h时FABP3、GPBB与cTnI呈正相关性(r分别为0.615,0.579,P<0.05)。6 h和24 h时FABP3、GPBB与cTnI 3项联合诊断心肌损伤的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.912和0964,其敏感度和特异度分别为90.33%、86.31%与96.25%、89.17%。6 h时FABP3诊断心肌损伤的AUC(0.855)明显高于cTnI(0.773)(Z=4.032,P<0.05),而GPBB与cTnI比较差异无统计学意义(Z=1.536,P>0.05)。24 h时FABP3和GPBB诊断心肌损伤的AUC(0.886、0.867)明显低于cTnI(0.912),差异具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:血清FABP3、GPBB可以与cTnI联合作为早期诊断脓毒症患者心肌损伤的有效生物学标志物。
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Levy MM,Dellinger RP,Townsend SR,et al.The Surviving Sepsis Campaign:results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis[J].Intensive Care Med,2010,36(2):222-231.

    [2]

    Fleischmann C,Scherag A,Adhikari NK,et al.Assessment of Global Incidence and Mortality of Hospital-treated Sepsis.Current Estimates and Limitations[J].Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2016,193(3):259-272.

    [3]

    李昕原,吴彩军,郭楠,等.脓毒症心肌病的研究进展[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志,2019,26(3):373-378.

    [4]

    Werdan K,Schmidt H,Ebelt H,et al.Impaired regulation of cardiac function in sepsis,SIRS,and MODS[J].Can J Physiol Pharmacol,2009,87(4):266-274.

    [5]

    de Souza DC,Shieh HH,Barreira ER,et al.Epidemiology of Sepsis in Children Admitted to PICUs in South America[J].Pediatr Crit Care Med,2016,17(8):727-734.

    [6]

    Ye XD,He Y,Wang S,et al.Heart-type fatty acid binding protein(H-FABP)as a biomarker for acute myocardial injury and long-term post-ischemic prognosis[J].Acta Pharmacol Sin,2018,39(7):1155-1163.

    [7]

    彭可.心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白及糖原磷酸化酶同工酶脑型与脓毒症心肌损伤的相关性研究进展[J].中国小儿急救医学,2017,24(12):939-943.

    [8]

    Singer M,Deutschman CS,Seymour CW,et al.The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock(sepsis-3)[J].JAMA,2016,315(8):801-810.

    [9]

    Corsten MF,Dennert R,Jochems S,et al.Circulating MicroRNA-208b and MicroRNA-499 reflect myocardial damage in cardiovascular disease[J].Circ Cardiovasc Genet,2010,3(6):499-506.

    [10]

    桑珍珍,郭晋平,贾春梅,等.脓毒性心肌病的危险因素分析及早期治疗[J].临床急诊杂志,2017,18(6):416-419.

    [11]

    杨龙贵,仇君,罗海燕,等.肌钙蛋白Ⅰ在脓毒症患儿的临床价值[J].国际检验医学杂志,2019,40(4):388-391.

    [12]

    修欣欣,马利,翟颖,等.降钙素原及 APACHE-Ⅱ 、 SOFA评估复杂腹腔感染后脓毒性休克预后的价值[J].临床血液学杂志,2019,32(8):586-589.

    [13]

    Su WL,Shui HA,Lan CC,et al.Cardiovascular Parameters Associated With Troponin I as Indicators for 14-Day Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock[J].Am J Med Sci,2018,356(3):244-253.

    [14]

    詹亚胜,张骏,葛国平.CHD伴肺部感染患儿心肌酶联合NT-proBNP的意义分析[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2019,30(6):718-721.

    [15]

    Singh N,Rathore V,Mahat RK,et al.Glycogen Phosphorylase BB:A more Sensitive and Specific Marker than Other Cardiac Markers for Early Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction[J].Indian J Clin Biochem,2018,33(3):356-360.

    [16]

    田斌,刘兰凤,邓虎重,等.糖原磷酸化酶同工酶脑型和缺血修饰蛋白在新生儿窒息合并心肌损伤中的变化及临床意义[J].国际检验医学杂志,2017,38(17):2342-2343,2346.

    [17]

    Cubranic Z,Madzar Z,Matijevic S,et al.Diagnostic accuracy of heart fatty acid binding protein(H-FABP)and glycogen phosphorylase isoenzyme BB(GPBB)in diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with acute coronary syndrome[J].Biochem Med(Zagreb),2012;22(2):225-236.

    [18]

    Sotoudeh Anvari M,Karimi M,Shafiee A,et al.Complementary Diagnostic Value of Heart Type Fatty Acid-binding Protein in Early Detection of Acute Myocardial Infarction[J].Crit Pathw Cardiol,2018,17(1):43-46.

    [19]

    Gerede DM,Güleç S,Kiliçkap M,et al.Comparison of a qualitative measurement of heart-type fatty acid-binding protein with other cardiac markers as an early diagnostic marker in the diagnosis of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J].Cardiovasc J Afr,2015,26(6):204-209.

    [20]

    孙垚,唐珩,张跃.血清FABP3联合GPBB检测在小儿脓毒症心肌损伤诊断中的价值[J].山东医药,2019,59(4):55-58.

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  207
  • PDF下载数:  241
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2020-07-01

目录