正中入路和侧入路可视喉镜置入气管插管术后咽痛发生率

吴功名, 狄高弘, 王辉, 等. 正中入路和侧入路可视喉镜置入气管插管术后咽痛发生率[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2017, 18(12): 926-928. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2017.12.011
引用本文: 吴功名, 狄高弘, 王辉, 等. 正中入路和侧入路可视喉镜置入气管插管术后咽痛发生率[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2017, 18(12): 926-928. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2017.12.011
WU Gongming, DI Gaohong, WANG Hui, et al. Incidence of postoperative sore throat between middle and lateral approach to videolaryngoscope insertion for endotracheal intubation[J]. J Clin Emerg, 2017, 18(12): 926-928. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2017.12.011
Citation: WU Gongming, DI Gaohong, WANG Hui, et al. Incidence of postoperative sore throat between middle and lateral approach to videolaryngoscope insertion for endotracheal intubation[J]. J Clin Emerg, 2017, 18(12): 926-928. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2017.12.011

正中入路和侧入路可视喉镜置入气管插管术后咽痛发生率

详细信息
    通讯作者: 吴志林,E-mail:840916@qq.com
  • 中图分类号: R766

Incidence of postoperative sore throat between middle and lateral approach to videolaryngoscope insertion for endotracheal intubation

More Information
  • 目的:比较正中入路和侧入路可视喉镜置入下全身麻醉气管插管术后咽痛的发生率。方法:选取本院拟行全身麻醉妇科手术,Mallampati气道分级1~2级患者360例,随机分为两组,分别采用正中入路可视喉镜下气管插管和侧入路可视喉镜下气管插管,术后1h和24h对患者访视进行咽痛分级,比较两组差异有无统计学意义。结果:采用正中入路可视喉镜气管插管患者术后咽痛发生率较侧入路显著降低。结论:采用正中入路可视喉镜下气管插管能够降低术后咽痛的发生率。
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Biro P, Seifert B, Pasch T, et al.Complaints of sore throat after tracheal intubation:aprospective evaluation[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2005, 22:307-311.

    [2]

    Scuderi P E.Postoperative sore throat:more answers than questions[J].Anesth Analg, 2010, 111:831-832.

    [3]

    Xue F S, Yang B Q, Liu Y Y, et al.Current Evidences for the Use of UEscope in Airway Management[J].Chin Med J (Engl), 2017, 130:1867-1875.

    [4]

    Jaensson M, Gupta A, Nilsson U G, et al.Gender differences in risk factors for airway symptoms following tracheal intubation[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2012, 56:1306-1313.

    [5]

    Hu B J, Bao.R, Wang X L, et al.The size of endotracheal tube and sore throat after surgery:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Plos One, 2013, 8:e74467-e74467.

    [6]

    司淼, 王丽秀, 王建宾, 等.院前急救中喉罩置管与可视喉镜下插管的应用比较[J].临床急诊杂志, 2016, 17 (5):396-398.

    [7]

    Eismann H, Lion S, Etti N, et al.Improved success rates using videolaryngoscopy in unexperienced users:a randomized crossover study in airway manikins[J].Eur J Med Res, 2017, 10:27-27.

    [8]

    Purugganan R V, Jackson T A, Heir J S, et al.Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for doublelumen endotracheal tube intubation:a retrospective analysis[J].J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2012, 26:845-848.

    [9]

    Patil V V, Subramanya B H, Kiranchand N, et al.Does C-MAC video laryngoscope improve the nasotracheal intubating conditions compared to Macintosh direct laryngoscope in paediatric patients posted for tonsillectomy surgeries?[J].Indian J Anaesth, 2016, 60:732-736.

    [10]

    Najafi A, Imani F, Makarem J, et al.Postoperative sore throat after laryngoscopy with macintosh or glide scope video laryngoscope blade in normal airway patients[J].Anesth Pain Med, 2014, 4:e15136-e15136.

    [11]

    Thorley D S, Simons A R, Mirza O, et al.Palatal and retropharyngeal injury secondary to intubation using the Glide Scope videolaryngoscope[J].Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2015, 97:67-69.

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  158
  • PDF下载数:  47
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2017-09-22

目录