日常生活能力量表对AECOPD患者机械通气治疗结局的预测价值

高波, 王树云, 朱长清, 等. 日常生活能力量表对AECOPD患者机械通气治疗结局的预测价值[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2017, 18(6): 448-451. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2017.06.012
引用本文: 高波, 王树云, 朱长清, 等. 日常生活能力量表对AECOPD患者机械通气治疗结局的预测价值[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2017, 18(6): 448-451. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2017.06.012
GAO Bo, WANG Shuyun, ZHU Changqing, et al. Predictive value of ADL score in AECOPD patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation[J]. J Clin Emerg, 2017, 18(6): 448-451. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2017.06.012
Citation: GAO Bo, WANG Shuyun, ZHU Changqing, et al. Predictive value of ADL score in AECOPD patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation[J]. J Clin Emerg, 2017, 18(6): 448-451. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2017.06.012

日常生活能力量表对AECOPD患者机械通气治疗结局的预测价值

  • 基金项目:

    上海市科学技术委员会科研计划项目 (No:15DZ1941307)

详细信息
    通讯作者: 陆晓晔, E-mail:luxiaoye@renji.com
  • 中图分类号: R563

Predictive value of ADL score in AECOPD patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation

More Information
  • 目的: 对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)伴呼吸衰竭接受有创呼吸支持治疗的患者,目前临床上尚缺乏有效可行的生活质量评分系统来预测撤机结果。本研究尝试采用非特异的日常生活能力(ADL)评定量表Barthel指数来预测此类患者的治疗转归。方法: 前瞻性分析25例行有创机械通气的AECOPD患者,统计入院时的动脉血气分析、炎症指标、血糖、心衰指数、营养状况和APPACHEⅡ评分等指标以及患者近期稳定状态时ADL评分,根据撤机结果分为撤机成功组(12例)和撤机失败组(13例),统计2组各项指标的差异。再根据ADL评分,将25例患者分为ADL>60分组(13例)和ADL ≤ 60分组(12例),比较2组撤机成功率和6个月病死率。结果: 撤机成功组与撤机失败组间仅ADL评分差异有统计学意义(93.46±5.16 vs.52.08±16.71,P=0.022),其余各项指标差异均无统计学意义。ADL>60分组和ADL ≤ 60分组的撤机成功率比较差异有统计学意义(84.6% vs.8.3%,P<0.0001),6个月病死率比较差异有统计学意义(23.1% vs.100.0%,P<0.0001)。结论: 本次预实验的研究结果表明ADL评分对AECOPD机械通气的治疗结局有较好的预测价值。
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Brochard L, Mancebo J, Wysocki M, et al.Noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonay disease[J].N Engl J Med, 1995, 333 (13):817-822.

    [2]

    Bott J, Carroll M P, Conway J H, et al.Randomised controlled trial of nasal ventilation in acute ventilatory failure due to chronic obstructive airways disease[J].Lancet, 1993, 341 (8860):1555-1557.

    [3]

    Kramer N, Meyer T J, Meharg J, et al.Randomized, prospective trial of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure[J].Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1995, 151 (6):1799-1806.

    [4]

    Celikel T, Sungur M, Ceyhan B, et al.Comparison of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation with standard medical therapy in hypercapnic acute respiratory failure[J].Chest, 1998, 114 (6):1636-1642.

    [5]

    Plant P K, Owen J L, Elliott M W.Early use of noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on general respiratory wards:a multicentre randomized controlled trial[J].Lancet, 2000, 355 (9219):1931-1935.

    [6]

    陆志华, 徐秋萍, 袁月华, 等.膈肌增厚分数指导慢性阻塞性肺疾病机械通气患者撤机的临床研究[J].中华急诊医学杂志, 2016, 25 (4):491-494.

    [7]

    刘火根, 刘玲, 汤睿, 等.评价膈肌功能指导慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者撤机的可行性研究[J].中华内科杂志, 2011, 50 (6):459-464.

    [8]

    Menzies R, Gibbons W, Goldberg P.Determinants of weaning and survival among patients with COPD who require mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure[J].Chest, 1989, 95 (2):398-405.

    [9]

    Nava S, Rubini F, Zanotti E, et al.Survival and prediction of successful ventilator weaning in COPD patients requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 21days[J].Eur Respir J, 1994, 7 (9):1645-1652.

    [10]

    Monjazebi F, Dalvandi A, Ebadi A, et al.Functional status assessment of COPD based on ability to perform daily living activities:a systematic review of paper and pencil instruments[J].Glob J Health Sci, 2016, 8 (3):210-223.

    [11]

    Langlet K, Van Der Linden T, Claire Launois, et al.Predictive value of daily living score in acute respiratory failure of COPD patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation pilot study[J].BMC Pulm Med, 2012, 12:66.

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  160
  • PDF下载数:  421
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2017-04-25

目录