Comparison of the effect of fast airway establishment by Glidescope and laryngendoscope in the treatment of sudden cardiac arrest patients with advanced life support
-
摘要: 目的:比较可视喉镜与传统喉镜快速建立气道在心脏骤停患者高级生命支持治疗中的效果。方法:选取安徽医科大学第二附属医院急诊内科和EICU(急诊重症监护病房)2012-03-2016-03心脏骤停需高级生命支持行气管插管患者78例,按入院时间分为普通喉镜组(A组)及可视喉镜组(B组),观察2组患者暴露声门时间、插管总时间、插管次数、指尖血氧饱和度的变化及插管成功率、牙齿和气道的损伤率。结果:A组和B组患者在插管成功率和指尖血氧饱和度的变化的比较上差异无统计学意义。而在暴露声门时间、插管总时间、插管总次数、牙齿和气道的损伤率的比较上,B组患者较A组患者显著下降(P<0.05)。结论:在临床上,可视喉镜与普通喉镜相比,插管成功率未见明显提升,但是可快速建立有效气道,缩短插管时间,且牙齿及气道的损伤率有所下降,值得推广。Abstract: Objective:To compare the effect of fast airway establishment by Glidescope and laryngendoscope in the treatment of sudden cardiac arrest patients with advanced life support.Method:Seventy-eight patients were selected who demanded advanced life support undergoing tracheal intubation in Emergency Department and Emergency Intensive care unit of the Second hospital of Anhui Medical University in March 2012 to March 2016.They were divided into laryngoscope group (group A) and Glidescope group (group B).Observe the glottic exposure time,the total intubation time,intubation times,the success rate,changes of blood oxygen saturation and injury rate of teeth and airway of patients of two groups.Result:The success rate of intubation and changes of blood oxygen saturation between the two groups have no statistical significance,yet the glottis exposure time,intubation time,intubation times,and the injury rate of teeth and airway of group B were significantly decreased than those of group A (P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared to laryngoscope,Glidescope can not significantly improve the success rate of intubation,but can effectively establish airway,shorten the duration of intubation,and e injury rate of teeth and airway.So it should be promoted.
-
Key words:
- sudden cardiac arrest /
- Glidescope /
- laryngendoscope /
- trachea cannula
-
-
[1] 余涛,蒋龙元,黄子通.《2015年美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南》更新解读[J].岭南急诊医学杂志,2015,20(5):357-358.
[2] 王政林.视频喉镜在院前急救气管插管术中的应用价值[J].微创医学,2012,7(6):646-647.
[3] 李华,嵇晓阳,孙怡.可视喉镜在手术室外急诊气管插管术中的临床应用[J].中国医药指南,2013,11(5):540-541.
[4] 邱丽秋.视频喉镜在院前急救气管插管术中的护理配合[J].中外医学研究,2013,14(3):84-85.
[5] Deakin C D,Nolan J P,Soar J,et al.European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for resuscitation 2010Section 4.Adult advanced life support[J].Resuscitation,2010,81:1305-1352.
[6] Deakin C D,Morrison L J,Morley P T,et al.Advanced life support:2010International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science withTreatment[J].Resuscitation,2010,81:e93-174.
[7] Neumar R W,Otto C W,Link M S,et al.Adult advanced cardiovascular life support:2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care[J].Circulation,2010,122:S729-S767.
[8] Park S O,Baek K J,Hong D Y,et al.Feasibility of the video-laryngoscope(GlideScope)for endotracheal intubation during uninterrupted chest compressions in actual advanced life support:A clinical observational study in an urban emergency department[J].Resuscitation,2013,84:1233-1237.
[9] Sadamori T,Kusunoki S,Ishida M,et al.Video laryngoscopy for emergency tracheal intubation during chest compression[J].Resuscitation,2008,77:155-156.
[10] Komasawa N,Ueki R,Yamamoto N,et al.Comparison of air-Q((R))and Soft Seal((R))laryngeal mask for airway management by novice doctors during infant chest compression:a manikin study[J].Resuscitation,2012,83:365-368.
[11] Han S K,Shin D H,Choi P C.Utility of the PentaxAWS without interruption of chest compression:comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope with the Pentax-AWS in manikin model[J].Resuscitation,2010,81:69-73.
[12] Kim Y M,Kang H G,Kim J H,et al.Direct versus video laryngoscopic intubation by novice prehospital intubators with and without chest compressions:apilot manikin study[J].Prehosp Emerg Care,2011,15:98-103.
[13] Kim Y M,Kim J H,Kang H G,et al.Tracheal intubation using Macintosh and 2video laryngoscopes with and without chest compressions[J].Am J Emerg Med,2011,29:682-686.
[14] Shin D H,Han S K,Choi P C,et al.Park Tracheal intubation during chest compressions performed by qualified emergency physicians unfamiliar with the Pentax-Airwayscope[J].Eur J Emerg Med,2012.[Epub ahead of print].
[15] Stroumpoulis K,Xanthos T,Bassiakou E,et al.Macintosh and glidescope performance by advanced cardiac life support providers:a manikin study[J].Anestesiol,2011,77:11-16.
[16] Xanthos T,Stroumpoulis K,Bassiakou E,et al.Glidescope videolaryngoscope improves intubation success rate in cardiac arrest scenarios without chest compressions interruption:a randomized cross-over manikin study[J].Resuscitation,2011,82:464-467.
[17] Jones J H,Murphy M P,Dickson R L,et al.Emergency physician-verified out-of-hospital intubation:miss rates by paramedics[J].Acad Emerg Med,2004,11:707-709.
[18] Katz S H,Falk J L.Misplaced endotracheal tubes by paramedics in an urban emergency medical services system[J].Ann Emerg Med,2001,37:32-37.
[19] Lyon R M,Ferris J D,Young D M,et al.Field intubation of cardiac arrest patients:a dying art?[J].Emerg Med J,2010,27:21-323.
[20] Timmermann A,Russo S G,Eich C,et al.The out-ofhospital esophageal and endobronchial intubations performed by emergency physicians[J].Anesth Analg,2007,104:619-623.
[21] Wirtz D D,Ortiz C,Newman D H.Zhitomirsky Unrecognized misplacement of endotracheal tubes by ground prehospital providers[J].Prehosp Emerg Care,2007,11:213-218.
[22] Shin D H,Choi P C,Han S K.Tracheal intubation during chest compressions using Pentax-AWS?,GlideScope?,and Macintoshlaryngoscope:a randomized crossover trial using a mannequin[J].Can J Anaesth,2011,58:733-739
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 132
- PDF下载数: 285
- 施引文献: 0
下载: