-
摘要: 目的: 评价不同液体早期复苏对感染性休克患者EGDT达标、血乳酸清除率、APACHEⅡ评分和28 d病死率的影响。方法: 选取2005-10-2010-10收住ICU的感染性休克患者作为研究对象,随机分为高渗氯化钠羟乙基淀粉40溶液组(霍姆组)、3%高渗氯化钠组(高钠组)、羟乙基淀粉130/0.4氯化钠溶液组(万汶组)、生理盐水组(NS组)。分别经中心静脉通路输入相应的复苏液体,配合林格液对患者进行包括6 h早期液体复苏在内的早期目标指导性治疗(EGDT)。分别记录各组患者在液体复苏前及复苏0、1、3和6 h的心率(HR)、MAP、CVP、24 h血乳酸值,并计算24 h血乳酸清除率。观察EGDT达标情况、升压药物使用情况、复苏前及复苏72 h的APACHEⅡ评分变化以及28 d病死率。结果: ①共收集符合条件标准的病例51例:霍姆组12例、高钠组10例、万汶组14例、NS组15例。各组患者的性别、年龄、MAP、CVP、HR、APACHEⅡ评分、血乳酸值比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);②研究液体用量在各组间比较,霍姆组与高钠组比较,差异无统计学意义;NS组、万汶组各自与其他3组比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);复苏液体总量在各组间比较,NS组与其他3组比较,万汶组与霍姆组比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);高钠组与霍姆组、高钠组和万汶组比较,差异均无统计学意义;林格液量在各组间比较,差异均无统计学意义;③随复苏时间延长,MAP逐渐升高,HR逐渐减慢,MAP、HR在不同时间点各组间比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。随复苏时间延长,CVP逐渐升高,在复苏1 h、3 h和6 h时,霍姆组CVP均高于NS组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05);且在复苏1 h时,霍姆组CVP高于万汶组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),高钠组CVP显著高于NS组(P<0.05);④复苏24 h血乳酸值及其清除率在各组间比较,以及复苏后72 h APACHEⅡ评分在各组间比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);⑤各组患者使用升压药例数、使用升压药>3 d例数及EGDT达标例数比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。感染性休克患者的整体病死率为45.10%(23/51),28 d病死率在各组间比较,差异无统计学意义。结论: 在感染性休克的早期液体复苏中,应用霍姆有利于提高CVP,但对需要应用升压药时间、EGDT达标、乳酸清除率、APACHEⅡ评分以及28 d病死率并无无显著影响;对某些需限制性液体管理的患者,使用高渗氯化钠羟乙基淀粉40注射液或高渗盐水可以减少补液总量。Abstract: Objective: To study the effects of different fluids on EGDT standards, blood lactate clearance, APACHEⅡscore and 28 d mortality in patients with septic shock after early fluid resuscitation.Method: From October 2005 to October 2010, patients with septic shock in ICU were enrolled and randomly divided into four groups according to the fluids used in resuscitation:hypertonic sodium chloride hydroxylethyl starch 40 group (Home group), 3% hypertonic saline solution group (HS group), Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4 and Sodium Chloride (Wanwen group), normal salinegroup (NS group). Patients of different groups received fluid resuscitation via central vein, match with Ringers to treatment undergoing 6 h early goal directed therapy (EGDT). On the initial and after EGDT 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and central venous pressure (CVP), 24 h blood concentration of lactate, and 24 h blood lactate clearance rate were detected. Attainment of EGDT, dosage of hypertensor, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHE II) scores before and 72 h after resuscitation, and 28 d mortality in patients were monitored.Result: 51 cases according to criteria were referred to our study, namely, Home group (n=12), HS group (n=10), Wanwen group (n=14), NS group (n=15). There were no differences in age, gender, MAP, CVP, HR, APACHEⅡ scoring value after admission to ICU and the initial blood concentration of lactate (P>0.05). There were significant differences of the study fluid volume in the four groups, NS grouP>Wanwen grouP>Home group (HS group) (P<0.05). And there were no difference of the total fluid volume between Home group and HS group, but significant differences in the three groups, NS grouP>Wanwen grouP>Home group (P<0.05). Along with the resuscitation, MAP and CVP increased, and HR decreased, but there were no difference of MAP and HR in the four groups. The CVP in Home group was significantly higher than in NS group 1 h, 3 h and 6 h after the fluid resuscitation (P<0.05, respectively), and also in Home group than Wanwen group (P<0.01), HS group than NS group 1 h after resuscitation (P<0.05), Home group than NS group at 6 h after resuscitation (P<0.05). There were no differences of 24 h blood concentration of lactate and clearance rate in the four groups, also no differences of other parameters such as APACHEⅡ scores 72 h after resuscitation, the number of patients requiring using hypertensor and that of using hypertensor>3 d, and the number of attainment of EGDT (P>0.05, respectively). 23 patients died (the overall mortality was 45.10%), and 28 d mortality showed no significant differences among these groups (P>0.05, respectively).Conclusion: In patients with septic shock receiving early fluid resuscitation, different kinds of fluid can achieve treatment goals, do not effect time of requiring using hypertensor, blood lactate clearance rate, APACHE Ⅱscore, and 28 d mortality. Compared with other fluids, hypertonic sodium chloride hydroxylethyl starch 40 or 3% hypertonic saline solution are a good alternative for lower total resuscitation volume to achieve the same goal.
-
Key words:
- shock /
- septic shock /
- fluid resuscitation
-
-
[1] American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference.Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis[J].Crit Care Med,1992,20:864-874.
[2] DELLINGER R P,CARLET J M,MASUR H,et al.Surviving sepsis campaign guidelines for manage-ment of severe sepsis and septic shock[J].Crit Care Med,2004,32:858-873.
[3] FITCH S J,GOSSAGE J R.Optimal management of septic shock.Rapid recognition and institution of therapy are crucial[J].Postgrad Med,2002,111:53-56,59-60,63-64.
[4] COOK D.Is albumin safe[J]?N Engl J Med,2004,350:2294-2296.
[5] VINCENT J L,GERLACH H.Fluid resuscitation in severe sepsis and septic shock:an evidence-based review[J].Crit Care Med,2004,32(11 Supp1):S451454.
[6] FINFER S,BELLOMO R,BOYCE N,et al.A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit[J].N Engl J Med,2004,350:2247-2256.
[7] 李峰,孙华,韩旭东.不同液体对感染性休克早期液体复苏的影响研究[J].中国危重病急救医学,2008,20(8):472-475.
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 142
- PDF下载数: 85
- 施引文献: 0