ESWL与药物治疗输尿管结石肾绞痛疗效对比分析（附800例临床分析）

详细信息

收稿日期: 2012-02-20

The analyses of therapeutic effects of ESWL on renal colic compared with medical therapy（800cases involved）

- Department of Emergency Surgery, Beijing Haidian Hospital, Beijing 100048, China

More Information

Received Date: 20 February 2012

摘要: 目的: 探讨体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗输尿管结石致肾绞痛与药物治疗肾绞痛疗效对比的临床分析。方法: 对400例输尿管结石致肾绞痛急诊行ESWL治疗。对400例输尿管结石致肾绞痛给予药物治疗。结果: ESWL治疗有效率96.5%。药物治疗的疼痛缓解率为81.7%。结论: 急诊ESWL治疗输尿管结石致肾绞痛疗效肯定,方法简捷,可作为首选。
- 体外冲击波碎石 /
- 肾绞痛 /
- 药物治疗
Abstract: Objective: To study the different therapeutic effects between ESWL and medical therapy on renal colic caused by ureteral calculus.Method: A group of 400 cases of renal colic caused by ureteral calculus from the emergency department treated by ESWL were compared with the other group of 400 patients treated by medical therapy.Result: The success rate of pain relieving in ESWL treated group was 96.5%,and the total effective rate for medical therapy was 81.7%.Conclusion: ESWL is preferred to treat renal colic caused by ureteral calculus is convenience and more efficient than medical treatment.
- ESWL /
- renal colic /
- medical therapy

[1]	吴阶平.吴阶平泌尿外科学[M].山东:山东科学技术出版社,2004:784-785.
[2]	孙西钊,叶章群.肾绞痛诊断和治疗新概念[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2007,22(5):321-323.
[3]	SEIFERT C F,KENNEDY S.Meperidine is alive and well in the new illen-nium:evaluation of meperidine usage patterns and frequency of adverse drug eaction[J].Pharmacotherapy,2004,24:776-783.
[4]	冯波,郭晓,郑宝寿.CT值对输尿管结石ESWL疗效的预测价值[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2007,22(3):199-200.
[5]	叶章群,邓耀良,董诚.泌尿系结石[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:321-322.
[6]	叶章群,邓耀良,董诚.泌尿系结石[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:601-602.
[7]	ARGYROPOULOS A N,TOLLEY D A.Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy in the 21 st century[J].Eur Urol,2007,52:344-354.
[8]	PAREEK G,HEDICAN S P,LEE F T J R,et al.Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-tostone distance on computed tomography[J].Urology,2005,66:941-944.