股骨远端骨折锁定钢板内固定失败原因分析

严力军; 廉凯

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2012.02.022

股骨远端骨折锁定钢板内固定失败原因分析

严力军,
廉凯^,

- 湖北省襄阳市中心医院骨科(湖北襄阳, 441021)

详细信息

通讯作者: 廉凯,E-mail:liankai2000@163.com

中图分类号: R683

收稿日期: 2011-10-17

Analysis of failure cause for treatment of fracture of distal femur by locking plate

YAN Lijun,
LIAN Kai^,

- Department of Orthopedics, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Xiangyang 441021, China

More Information

Corresponding author: LIAN Kai, E-mail: liankai2000@163.com

Received Date: 17 October 2011

摘要

摘要: 目的：探讨股骨远端骨折行锁定钢板术后发生内固定失败的原因。方法：分析15例股骨远端骨折术后内固定失败的原因，均再次手术、植骨、内固定。结果：术后平均随访时间12个月（8~20个月）。术后8个月，所有病例骨折均愈合。HSS评分为81~100分，平均（90.6±2.3）分，和术前（71.5±4.8）分比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）。关节活动度正常者13例，屈膝活动受限者2例，但均<10°。结论：锁定钢板固定不恰当、复位不充分、骨折固定的原则和方法不正确、钢板选择不恰当及患肢负重过早可能是股骨远端骨折行锁定钢板术后发生内固定失败的主要原因。
- 骨折 /
- 股骨远端 /
- 锁定钢板 /
- 失败 /
- 原因分析
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the failure cause for treatment of fractures of distal femur with locking plate.Method: 15 cases of failure of fractures of distal femur with locking plate were analyzed,and reoperated with internal fixation,with bone graft.Result: Average follow-up was 12 months(range from 8 to 20 months).Fractures were united within 8 months after operation in all cases.The HSS score was 81 to 100,with an average of 90.6±2.3,and significantly increased compared to 71.5±4.8 before operation(P<0.01).The range of motion was normal in 13 patients.Flexion deficit was found in 2 cases,but within 10°.Conclusion: The main causes of failure for treatment of fractures of distal femur with locking plate include incorrect fixation of locking plate,insufficient reduction,incorrect principle and method of fracture fixation,incorrect choice of plate,and postoperatively earlier weight-bearing.
- fracture /
- distal femur /
- locking plate /
- failure /
- cause analysis

HTML全文

参考文献(10)

[1]	SCHUTZ M,MULLER M,REGAZZONI P,et al.Use of the less invasive stabilization system (LISS) in patients with distal femoral (AO33) fractures:a prospective multicenter study[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2005,125:102-108.
[2]	MARSHALL J L,FETTO J F,BOTERO P M.Knee ligament injuries:a standardized evaluation method[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,1977:115-129.
[3]	YU X,ZHANG C,LI X,et al.Treatment evaluation of distal femoral fracture by less invasive stabilization system via two incisions[J].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi,2008,22:520-523.
[4]	HENDERSON C E,KUHL L L,FITZPATRICK D C,et al.Locking plates for distal femur fractures:is there a problem with fracture healing[J]?J Orthop Trauma,25:S8-14.
[5]	KREGOR P J,STANNARD J A,ZLOWODZKI M,et al.Treatment of distal femur fractures using the less invasive stabilization system:surgical experience and early clinical results in 103 fractures[J].J Orthop Trauma,2004,18:509-520.
[6]	WEIGHT M,COLLINGE C.Early results of the less invasive stabilization system for mechanically unstable fractures of the distal femur (AO/OTA types A2,A3,C2,and C3)[J].J Orthop Trauma,2004,18:503-508.
[7]	EGOL K A,KUBIAK E N,FULKERSON E,et al.Biomechanics of locked plates and screws[J].J Orthop Trauma,2004,18:488-493.
[8]	LUJAN T J,HENDERSON C E,MADEY S M,et al.Locked plating of distal femur fractures leads to inconsistent and asymmetric callus formation[J].J Orthop Trauma,24:156-162.
[9]	CHUNG K C,WATT A J,KOTSIS S V,et al.Treatment of unstable distal radial fractures with the volar locking plating system[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2006,88:2687-2694.
[10]	BUTTON G,WOLINSKY P,HAK D.Failure of less invasive stabilization system plates in the distal femur:a report of four cases[J].J Orthop Trauma,2004,18:565-570.