血清血管紧张素Ⅰ与血管紧张素1-7比值对脓毒症相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者预后的预测价值

冯长福, 邝顺灵, 甘惠玲. 血清血管紧张素Ⅰ与血管紧张素1-7比值对脓毒症相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者预后的预测价值[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2021, 22(9): 569-574. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2021.09.001
引用本文: 冯长福, 邝顺灵, 甘惠玲. 血清血管紧张素Ⅰ与血管紧张素1-7比值对脓毒症相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者预后的预测价值[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2021, 22(9): 569-574. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2021.09.001
FENG Zhangfu, KUANG Shunling, GAN Huiling. Serum angiotensinⅠ to angiotensin 1-7 ratio for predicting prognosis of patients with sepsis-related acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. J Clin Emerg, 2021, 22(9): 569-574. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2021.09.001
Citation: FENG Zhangfu, KUANG Shunling, GAN Huiling. Serum angiotensinⅠ to angiotensin 1-7 ratio for predicting prognosis of patients with sepsis-related acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. J Clin Emerg, 2021, 22(9): 569-574. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2021.09.001

血清血管紧张素Ⅰ与血管紧张素1-7比值对脓毒症相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者预后的预测价值

  • 基金项目:

    海南省卫生健康行业科研项目(No:1801032054A2006)

详细信息
    通讯作者: 甘惠玲,E-mail:fcffxh@163.com
  • 中图分类号: R631.2

Serum angiotensinⅠ to angiotensin 1-7 ratio for predicting prognosis of patients with sepsis-related acute respiratory distress syndrome

More Information
  • 目的:探讨血清血管紧张素(Ang)Ⅰ与Ang1-7比值对脓毒症相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者预后的预测价值。方法:回顾性分析88例脓毒症相关ARDS患者的相关资料,根据28 d死亡结局分为存活组(n=52)和死亡组(n=36),比较两组患者在基本情况、入院24 h脓毒症相关器官衰竭估计(SOFA)评分、血气分析、血小板、血清白蛋白、总胆红素、血肌酐、血乳酸、AngⅠ、Ang1-7及AngⅠ/Ang1-7比值等方面的差异。应用二元Logistic回归分析探讨脓毒症相关ARDS患者28 d死亡的影响因素;绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,评价各指标对脓毒症相关ARDS患者28 d死亡的预测价值;采用Spearson相关分析探讨脓毒症相关ARDS患者AngⅠ/Ang1-7比值与SOFA评分及氧合指数的相关性。结果:死亡组患者SOFA评分、AngⅠ、AngⅠ/Ang1-7比值、血乳酸、血肌酐及总胆红素水平明显高于存活组,而Ang1-7、氧合指数、碳酸氢根、pH及血小板水平明显低于存活组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。二元Logistic回归分析结果显示,SOFA评分(OR=1.371,95%CI:1.042~1.804,P=0.024)、AngⅠ(OR=1.502,95%CI:1.063~2.123,P=0.021)、Ang1-7(OR=0.196,95%CI:0.050~0.770,P=0.020)及AngⅠ/Ang1-7比值(OR=1.641,95%CI:1.090~2.470,P=0.018)为ARDS患者28 d死亡的独立影响因素。AngⅠ、Ang1-7、AngⅠ/Ang1-7比值及SOFA评分预测脓毒症相关ARDS患者28 d死亡的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.804(95%CI:0.706~0.881)、0.625(95%CI:0.515~0.726)、0.926(95%CI:0.850~0.971)、0.782(95%CI:0.681~0.863)。AngⅠ/Ang1-7比值预测脓毒症相关ARDS患者28 d死亡的AUC明显大于AngⅠ、Ang1-7及SOFA评分预测脓毒症相关ARDS患者28 d死亡的AUC(Z=2.322,P=0.020;Z=5.266,P<0.001;Z=2.564,P=0.010)。当AngⅠ/Ang1-7比值的最佳临界值为1.99时,预测脓毒症相关ARDS患者28 d死亡的敏感度为86.1%,特异度为92.3%。Spearson相关分析结果显示,脓毒症相关ARDS患者AngⅠ/Ang1-7比值与SOFA评分呈明显正相关(r=0.478,P<0.001),而与氧合指数呈明显负相关(r=-0.245,P=0.021)。结论:血清AngⅠ/Ang1-7比值与脓毒症相关ARDS患者的病情严重程度及预后密切相关,为28 d死亡的独立危险因素,可作为评价脓毒症相关ARDS患者预后的较好指标。
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Wang Y,Fu X,Yu B,et al.Long non-coding RNA THRIL predicts increased acute respiratory distress syndrome risk and positively correlates with disease severity,inflammation,and mortality in sepsis patients[J].J Clin Lab Anal,2019,33(6):e22882.

    [2]

    Nam H,Jang SH,Hwang YI,et al.Nonpulmonary risk factors of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with septic bacteraemia[J].Korean J Intern Med,2019,34(1):116-124.

    [3]

    Chen D,Wu X,Yang J,et al.Serum plasminogen activator urokinase receptor predicts elevated risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with sepsis and is positively associated with disease severity,inflammation and mortality[J].Exp Ther Med,2019,18(4):2984-2992.

    [4]

    张勤,胡相悦.血清KL-6、sTM、CC-16对脓毒症并发急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者预后的价值研究[J].临床急诊杂志,2020,21(9):711-716.

    [5]

    李真玉,李伟,宗晓龙,等.脓毒症并发急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者血清血管内皮钙黏蛋白水平变化及其与预后的关系[J].中华传染病杂志,2018,36(8):461-465.

    [6]

    林化,李超乾.肾素-血管紧张素系统在急性呼吸窘迫综合征发生发展中作用的研究进展[J].山东医药,2018,58(22):100-103.

    [7]

    Kim J,Choi SM,Lee J,et al.Effect of Renin-Angiotensin System Blockage in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome:A Retrospective Case Control Study[J].Korean J Crit Care Med,2017,32(2):154-163.

    [8]

    叶剑滨.血管紧张素Ⅱ及其受体与急性呼吸窘迫综合征关系的研究进展[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2017,31(3):310-312.

    [9]

    Reilly J P,Wang F,Jones T K,et al.Plasma angiopoietin-2 as a potential causal marker in sepsis-associated ARDS development:evidence from Mendelian randomization and mediation analysis[J].Intensive Care Med,2018,44(11):1849-1858.

    [10]

    Seymour CW,Liu VX,Iwashyna TJ,et al.Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis:For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock(Sepsis-3)[J].JAMA,2016,315(8):762-774.

    [11]

    Ranieri VM,Rubenfeld GD,Thompson BT,et al.Acute respiratory distress syndrome:the Berlin Defi nition[J].JAMA,2012,307(23):2526-2533.

    [12]

    Chinh LQ,Manabe T,Son DN,et al.Clinical epidemiology and mortality on patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS)in Vietnam[J].PLoS One,2019,14(8):e0221114.

    [13]

    Ma S,Zhao ML,Wang K,et al.Association of Ang-2,vWF,and EVLWI with risk of mortality in sepsis patients with concomitant ARDS:A retrospective study[J].J Formos Med Assoc,2020,119(5):950-956.

    [14]

    Simoes E,Silva AC,Teixeira MM.ACE inhibition,ACE2 and angiotensin-(1-7) axis in kidney and cardiac inflammation and fibrosis[J].Pharmacol Res,2016,107:154-162.

    [15]

    孙佳,朱彪.ACE2/Ang1-7/Mas在ALI/ARDS中作用机制研究[J].国际呼吸杂志,2016,36(8):632-635.

    [16]

    柴彦,郭喆,方奕鹏.ACE2在冠状病毒病-19多器官损伤中的作用[J].临床急诊杂志,2020,21(5):417-420.

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  233
  • PDF下载数:  67
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-06-11

目录