-
摘要: 目的:通过分析成人破伤风患者的临床特征和预后的关系,建立一个可以预测成人破伤风患者死亡风险的列线图模型,并对其准确性和临床效能进行验证和评估。方法:回顾性分析2013年1月—2019年12月南京市第二医院收治的97例成人破伤风患者,根据患者是否存活,将其分为存活组及死亡组,统计两组患者的人口学资料(包括性别、年龄、是否合并基础疾病)、临床表现(包括Ablett分级、潜伏期、发病时间、是否合并肺部感染)、治疗方法(包括伤口清创、使用破伤风抗毒素及破伤风人免疫球蛋白、气管插管或切开并机械通气、镇静镇痛、使用肌肉松弛药物、营养支持等),对纳入的上述指标进行单因素及多因素回归分析,筛选出预测成人破伤风患者死亡风险的独立危险因素,利用R语言软件可视化处理逻辑回归(LR)模型获得列线图模型,并对模型的准确性及临床效能进行评价。结果:97例成人破伤风患者中死亡14例,多因素Logistic回归分析显示,破伤风人免疫球蛋白的使用(OR=0.201,95%CI:0.047~0.865)、伤口是否清创(OR=0.231,95%CI:0.058~0.926)、是否机械通气(OR=12.57,95%CI:2.664~59.35)是预测成人破伤风患者死亡概率的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。根据以上独立危险因素建立的列线图模型预测成人破伤风死亡风险的一致性指数(C-index)为0.876,采用Bootstrap法对列线图模型进行内部验证,校准曲线显示列线图模型预测成人破伤风患者死亡风险与实际发生风险的平均绝对误差为0.056,ROC曲线显示其曲线下面积为0.876(95%CI:0.804~0.948),显示出其良好的准确度,决策曲线分析(DCA)显示以3项危险因素建立的全模型净收益率明显高于单一因素模型。结论:伤口未清创、未使用破伤风人免疫球蛋白、需机械通气是成人破伤风患者死亡的独立危险因素,基于此危险因素建立的预测模型可准确预测成人破伤风患者死亡风险并可有效使用于临床,提示我们尽早伤口清创及使用破伤风人免疫球蛋白可能会降低患者病死率。Abstract: Objective: By analyzing the relationship between clinical features and prognosis of adult tetanus patients, a nomogram model was established to predict the death risk of adult tetanus patients, and its accuracy and clinical efficacy were verified and evaluated.Methods: Ninety-seven cases of adult tetanus patients admitted to Nanjing Second Hospital from January 2013 to December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. According to whether the patients survived, they were divided into survival group and death group. The demographic data of two groups of patients including gender, age, whether they are combined with underlying diseases, clinical manifestations including Ablett grade, latency, onset time, whether they are complicated with lung infection, treatment including wound debridement, use of tetanus antitoxin and tetanus human immunoglobulin, endotracheal intubation or incision and mechanical ventilation, sedation and analgesia, use of muscle relaxant and nutritional support. Single-factor and multi-factor regression analysis were performed on the included indicators to screen out independent risk factors for predicting the death risk of adult tetanus patients. The nomogram model was obtained by using R language software to visually process the logistic regression(LR) model, and the accuracy and clinical efficacy of the model were evaluated.Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the use of tetanus human immunoglobulin(OR=0.201, 95%CI: 0.047-0.865), and whether the wound was debrided(OR=0.231, 95%CI: 0.058-0.926), whether mechanical ventilation(OR=12.57, 95%CI: 2.664-59.35) were the independent risk factors predicting the probability of death in adult tetanus patients(P<0.05). According to the above independent risk factors, the C-index for predicting the mortality risk of adult tetanus patients is 0.876. The bootstrap method is used to verify the model internally. The calibration curve shows that the average absolute error between the nomogram model's prediction of death risk and the actual risk of adult tetanus patients is 0.056, and the ROC curve shows that the area under the curve is 0.876(95%CI: 0.804-0.948), showing its good accuracy. Decision Curve Analysis(DCA) showed that the net return rate of the full model based on the three risk factors was significantly higher than that of the single factor model.Conclusion: Undebrided wounds, non-use of tetanus human immunoglobulin, and the need for mechanical ventilation are independent risk factors for the death of adult tetanus patients. The prediction model based on these risk factors can accurately predict the death risk of adult tetanus patients and can be used effectively in clinical practice, suggested that the early wound debridement and the use of tetanus human immunoglobulin may reduce the mortality of these patients.
-
Key words:
- tetanus /
- prognosis /
- influencing factors /
- nomogram model
-
[1] 中国创伤救治联盟,北京大学创伤医学中心.中国破伤风免疫预防专家共识[J].中华外科杂志,2018,56(3):161-167.
[2] Finkelstein P,Teisch L,Allen CJ,et al.Tetanus:A Potential Public Health Threat in Times of Disaster[J].Prehosp Disaster Med,2017,32(3):339-342.
[3] 中国医师协会急诊医师分会,中国人民解放军急救医学专业委员会,北京急诊医学学会,等.成人破伤风急诊预防及诊疗专家共识[J].临床急诊杂志,2018,19(12):801-811.
[4] Yen LM,Thwaites CL.Tetanus[J].Lancet,2019,393(10181):1657-1668.
[5] Roper MH,Vandelaer JH,Gasse FL.Maternal and neonatal tetanus[J].Lancet,2007,370(9603):1947-1959.
[6] 王传林,刘斯,邵祝军,等.外伤后破伤风疫苗和被动免疫制剂使用指南[J].中华预防医学杂志,2019,53(12):1212-1217.
[7] George EK,De Jesus O,Vivekanandan R.Clostridium Tetani.2021 Feb 7.In:StatPearls [J].Treasure Island (FL):StatPearls Publishing,2021.
[8] 黄晶煜,杜贤进,魏捷.破伤风诊治的关键环节[J].临床急诊杂志,2019,20(11):833-837.
[9] 杜贤进,魏捷,李佳,等.成人破伤风患者的临床救治分析[J].临床急诊杂志,2019,20(11):850-852.
[10] Sako FB,Sylla AO,Diallo M,et al.Tetanus:epidemiology and Factors Associated with Death in the Departement of Tropical and infectious diseases of Donka National Hospital,Guinea[J].Med Sante Trop,2019,29(3):333-336.
[11] Sun C,Zhao H,Lu Y,et al.Prognostic factors for generalized tetanus in adults:A retrospective study in a Chinese hospital[J].Am J Emerg Med,2019,37(2):254-259.
[12] 蔡妙甜,梁连春,李侗曾,等.破伤风的临床特点及预后影响因素分析[J].北京医学,2018,40(4):318-322.
[13] An VT,Khue PM,Yen LM,et al.[Tetanus in Ho Chi Minh City,Vietnam:epidemiological,clinical and outcome features of 389 cases at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases][J].Bull Soc Pathol Exot,2015,108(5):342-348.
[14] Woldeamanuel YW,Andemeskel AT,Kyei K,et al.Case fatality of adult tetanus in Africa:Systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Neurol Sci,2016,368:292-299.
[15] 中国医学救援协会.外伤后破伤风预防规范(T/CADERM 3001-2019)[J].中华预防医学杂志,2019,53(10):978-981.
[16] Nakajima M,Aso S,Matsui H,et al.Clinical features and outcomes of tetanus:Analysis using a National Inpatient Database in Japan[J].J Crit Care,2018,44:388-391.
[17] Mahieu R,Reydel T,Maamar A,et al.Admission of tetanus patients to the ICU:a retrospective multicentre study[J].Ann Intensive Care,2017,7(1):112.
计量
- 文章访问数: 234
- PDF下载数: 399
- 施引文献: 0