4种评分系统对脓毒症患儿预后的预测价值

张春侠; 蔡盈; 丁可; 周兰梅

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2020.12.012

4种评分系统对脓毒症患儿预后的预测价值

- 1. 徐州市儿童医院重症监护室(江苏徐州, 221006);
- 2. 徐州市儿童医院感染性疾病科;
- 3. 扬州大学附属医院儿科
基金项目:
江苏省卫生计生委2018年度医学科研面上课题(No:H2018021)

详细信息

通讯作者: 张春侠,E-mail:zhangcx0516@126.com

收稿日期: 2020-07-07

Prognostic value of four scoring systems in children with sepsis

- 1 Intensive Care Unit, Xuzhou Children's Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221006, China;
- 2 Department of Infectious Diseases, Xuzhou Children's Hospital;
- 3 Department of Pediatrics, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University

More Information

Corresponding author: ZHANG Chunxia, E-mail: zhangcx0516@126.com

Received Date: 07 July 2020

摘要

摘要: 目的:探讨儿童危重病例评分(PCIS)、儿童器官功能障碍评分2(PELOD-2)、儿童多器官功能障碍评分(P-MODS)、儿童年龄适应性序贯器官衰竭评分(pSOFA)在脓毒症患儿预后评估中的作用。方法:采用前瞻性观察研究,以2019年1月-2020年3月期间收住徐州市儿童医院重症医学科的515例脓毒症患儿为研究对象,根据入院28 d结局将患儿分为生存组(n=496)和死亡组(n=19)。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估PCIS、PELOD-2、P-MODS、pSOFA对脓毒症患儿死亡的预测价值,采用Z检验进行ROC曲线下面积(AUC)的比较。结果:①死亡组PELOD-2评分、P-MODS评分、pSOFA评分,均高于生存组[6(5,8)vs. 3(2,4),P=0.000;5(4,7)vs. 3(2,4),P=0.000;9(7,12)vs. 4(3,6),P=0.000],PCIS低于生存组[80(77,87)vs. 85(81,92),P=0.000]。②PCIS、PELOD-2、P-MODS、pSOFA评分预测脓毒症患儿死亡的AUC分别为0.787(0.703~0.857)、0.925(0.862~0.965)、0.814(0.732~0.879)、0.886(0.815~0.937),预测界值分别为78、5、4、7。③PELOD-2评分预测脓毒症患儿死亡的AUC,均显著高于PCIS、P-MODS评分(Z=2.298,P=0.022;Z=2.016,P=0.044),较pSOFA评分虽有升高趋势,但差异无统计学意义(Z=0.788,P=0.431)。结论:PCIS、PELOD-2、P-MODS、pSOFA评分均可较好地预测脓毒症患儿的预后,尤以PELOD-2评分更显著。
- 脓毒症 /
- 儿童危重病例评分 /
- 儿童器官功能障碍评分2 /
- 儿童多器官功能障碍评分 /
- 儿童序贯器官衰竭评分 /
- 预后
Abstract: Objective:To investigate the prognostic value of pediatric clinical illness score(PCIS), pediatric logistic organ dysfunction-2(PELOD-2), pediatric multiple organ dysfunction score(P-MODS), pediatric age-adapted sequential organ failure assessment(pSOFA) in children with sepsis.Methods:Prospective observational studies were used. From January 2019 to March 2020, a total of 515 children with sepsis admitted to the intensive care department of Xuzhou children's Hospital were included. According to the 28-day outcome of admission, the children were divided into survival group(n=496) and death group(n=19). The prognostic value of PCIS, PELOD-2, P-MODS and pSOFA on mortality of children with sepsis was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve. The area under ROC curve(AUC) was compared by Z test.Results:① The PELOD-2, P-MODS, and pSOFA in the death group were higher than those in the survival group(6[5, 8] vs. 3[2, 4], P=0.000; 5[4, 7] vs. 3[2, 4], P=0.000; 9[7, 12] vs. 4[3, 6], P=0.000), PCIS was lower than the survival group(80[77, 87] vs. 85[81, 92], P=0.000).②The AUC of PCIS, PELOD-2, P-MODS, and pSOFA scores to predict death in children with sepsis were 0.787(0.703-0.857), 0.925(0.862-0.965), 0.814(0.732-0.879), 0.886(0.815-0.937), the predicted cut-off values were 78, 5, 4, and 7, respectively.③ The AUC of PELOD-2 was significantly higher than that of PCIS and P-MODS(Z=2.298, P=0.022; Z=2.016, P=0.044), but there was no significant difference between PELOD-2 and pSOFA(Z=0.788, P=0.431).Conclusion:PCIS, PELOD-2, P-MODS and pSOFA can predict the prognosis of children with sepsis, especially PELOD-2 score is more significant.
- sepsis /
- pediatric clinical illness score /
- pediatric logistic organ dysfunction-2 /
- pediatric multiple organ dysfunction score /
- pediatric sequential organ failure assessment /
- prognosis

HTML全文

参考文献(16)

[1]	陈雪婷,钱素云.全球儿童脓毒症流行病学及病原学研究进展[J].中华儿科杂志,2019,57(5):380-383.
[2]	Tan B,Wong JJ,Sultana R,et al.Global Case-Fatality Rates in Pediatric Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J].JAMA Pediatr,2019,173(4):352-362.
[3]	于洋.脓毒症流行病学的研究进展[J].临床急诊杂志,2015,16(6):416-418,420.
[4]	Singer M,Deutschman CS,Seymour CW,et al.The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock(Sepsis-3)[J].JAMA,2016,315(8):801-810.
[5]	Dellinger RP,Levy MM,Rhodes A,et al.Surviving Sepsis Campaign:international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock,2012[J].Intensive Care Med,2013,39(2):165-228.
[6]	Matics TJ,Sanchez-Pinto LN.Adaptation and Validation of a Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score and Evaluation of the Sepsis-3 Definitions in Critically Ill Children[J].JAMA Pediatr,2017,171(10):e172352.
[7]	钟娩玲,黄宇戈.3种儿童危重评分在重症监护室脓毒症患儿预后评估中的作用[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志,2020,35(6):426-429.
[8]	张丽丹,黄慧敏,程玉才,等.4种小儿危重死亡评分对危重患儿死亡风险的预测价值[J].中华危重病急救医学,2018,30(1):51-56.
[9]	Leteurtre S,Duhamel A,Salleron J,et al.PELOD-2:an update of the Pediatric logistic organ dysfunction score[J].Crit Care Med,2013,41(7):1761-1773.
[10]	Leteurtre S,Duhamel A,Deken V,et al.Daily estimation of the severity of organ dysfunctions in critically ill children by using the PELOD-2 score[J].Crit Care,2015,19(1):324.
[11]	Gonçalves JP,Severo M,Rocha C,et al.Performance of PRISM III and PELOD-2 scores in a pediatric intensive care unit[J].Eur J Pediatr,2015,174(10):1305-1310.
[12]	Zhang L,Huang H,Cheng Y,et al.Predictive value of four pediatric scores of critical illness and mortality on evaluating mortality risk in pediatric critical patients[J].Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue,2018,30(1):51-56.
[13]	Schlapbach LJ,Straney L,Bellomo R,et al.Prognostic accuracy of age-adapted SOFA,SIRS,PELOD-2,and qSOFA for in-hospital mortality among children with suspected infection admitted to the intensive care unit[J].Intensive Care Med,2018,44(2):179-188.
[14]	Raith EP,Udy AA,Bailey M,et al.Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score,SIRS Criteria,and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit[J].JAMA,2017,317(3):290-300.
[15]	Rodrigues-Filho EM,Fernandes R,Garcez A.SOFA in the first 24 hours as an outcome predictor of acute liver failure[J].Rev Bras Ter Intensiva,2018,30(1):64-70.
[16]	Jentzer JC,Bennett C,Wiley BM,et al.Predictive Value of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for Mortality in a Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Population[J].J Am Heart Assoc,2018,7(6):e008169.