毛细血管渗漏指数对脓毒症合并ARDS早期诊断及预后的评估价值

王晓晖; 徐云海; 张波

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2020.05.003

毛细血管渗漏指数对脓毒症合并ARDS早期诊断及预后的评估价值

- 上海市浦东新区浦南医院急诊科(上海, 200125)

详细信息

通讯作者: 王晓晖,E-mail:shaiwangxhui@163.com

中图分类号: R541.4

收稿日期: 2019-08-20

Application of capillary leakage index in the early diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of sepsis complicated with ARDS

- Department of Emergency, Shanghai Punan Hospital, Shanghai, 200125, China

More Information

Corresponding author: WANG Xiaohui, E-mail: shaiwangxhui@163.com

Received Date: 20 August 2019

摘要

摘要: 目的:研究毛细血管渗漏指数(CLI)对脓毒症合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)早期诊断及预后的评估价值。方法:回顾性分析2015-01—2017-12期间我院收治的62例脓毒症患者的临床资料,根据是否合并ARDS、28 d的存活情况,分为ARDS组(n=34)和非ARDS组(n=28)、死亡组(n=29)和存活组(n=33),比较两组患者的基本资料,检测生理及实验室指标,采用Logistic回归分析脓毒症并发ARDS及其预后的危险因素。结果:与非ARDS组比较,ARDS组患者的脓毒症分级、血乳酸、CRP、APACHEⅡ评分、CLI、28 d病死率明显升高,ALB明显降低(P<0.05)。与存活组比较,死亡组患者的年龄明显增大,脓毒症分级、血乳酸、CRP、APACHEⅡ评分、CLI明显升高,ALB明显降低(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,APACHEⅡ评分、脓毒症分级、CLI均是脓毒症患者发生ARDS的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,年龄、APACHEⅡ评分、血乳酸及CLI均是脓毒症合并ARDS患者28 d内死亡的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。结论:CLI可作为脓毒症患者发生ARDS的早期诊断,并能够预测脓毒症合并ARDS患者的预后。
- 毛细血管渗漏指数 /
- 脓毒症 /
- 急性呼吸窘迫综合征 /
- 诊断 /
- 预后
Abstract: Objective: To explore the evaluation value of capillary leakage index(CLI) in the early diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of sepsis complicated with acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS). Method: Sixty-two cases of sepsis patients complicated with ARDS received treatment in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2017 was included, all the cases were divided into ARDS group(n=34) and non ARDS group(n=28), death group(n=29) and survival group(n=33) according to whether ARDS or not and mortality within 28 days. The basic data of the two groups were compared, physiological and laboratory indicators were detected, and Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors of ARDS and its prognosis in patients with sepsis. Result: Compared with non ARDS group, ARDS group had higher sepsis grading, blood lactic acid, CRP, APACHE Ⅱ score, CLI, mortality within 28 days, lower level of ALB(P<0.05). Compared with survival group, the age, sepsis grading, blood lactic acid, CRP, APACHE Ⅱ score, CLI in death group were increased obviously, and ALB was significantly decreased(P<0.05). Multiple Logistic regression analysis showed that the APACHE Ⅱ score, grade of sepsis, CLI were independent risk factors for ARDS in patients with sepsis(P<0.05). Multiple Logistic regression analysis showed that age, APACHE Ⅱ score, blood lactic acid and CLI were independent risk factors for death within 28 days in sepsis patients complicated with ARDS(P<0.05).Conclusion: CLI can be used as an early diagnosis of ARDS caused by sepsis, and it can predict the prognosis of sepsis patients complicated with ARDS.
- capillary leakage index /
- sepsis /
- acute respiratory distress syndrome /
- diagnosis /
- prognosis

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

[1]	Singer M,Deutschman CS,Seymour CW,et al.The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock(Sepsis-3)[J].JAMA,2016,315(8):801-810.
[2]	Bhattacharya M,Su G,Su X,et al.IQGAP1 is necessary for pulmonary vascular barrier protection in murine acute lung injury and pneumonia[J].Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,2012,303(1):12-19.
[3]	Mikkelsen ME,Shah CV,Meyer NJ,et al.The epidemiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients presenting to the emergency department with severe sepsis[J].Shock,2013,40(5):375-381.
[4]	石慧荣,熊滨.危重症疾病并发毛细血管渗漏综合征的研究进展[J].广西医学,2019,41(14):1824-1828.
[5]	Dellinger RP,Levy MM,Rhodes A,et al.Surviving sepsis campaign:international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock:2012[J].Crit Care Med,2013,41(2):580-637.
[6]	Kinoshita A,Onoda H,Imai N,et al.The C-reactive protein/albumin ratio,a novel inflammation-based prognostic score,predicts outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2015,22(3):803-810.
[7]	ARDS Definition Task Force,Ranieri VM,Rubenfeld GD,et al.Acute respiratory distress syndrome:the Berlin Definition[J].JAMA,2012,307(23):2526-2533.
[8]	Sheu CC,Gong MN,Zhai R,et al.Clinical characteristics and outcomes of sepsis-related vs non-sepsis-related ARDS[J].Chest,2010,138(3):559-567.
[9]	Barochia AV,Cui X,Eichacker PQ.The Surviving Sepsis Campaign's Revised Sepsis Bundles[J].Curr Infect Dis Rep,2013,15(5):385-393.
[10]	王军宇,王宏伟,刘温馨,等.降钙素原和血乳酸及病情严重程度评分对脓毒症患者预后的评估价值[J].中华危重病急救医学,2019,31(8):938-941.
[11]	刘烨,杜重伯,张雨霄,等.脓毒症发病机制进展[J].中国误诊学杂志,2019(1):28-32.
[12]	Ranzani OT,Zampieri FG,Forte DN,et al.C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio Predicts 90-Day Mortality of Septic Patients[J].PLOS ONE,2013,8(3):e59321.
[13]	梅华鲜,李永胜,陈正平,等.毛细血管渗漏指数在脓毒症并ARDS早期诊断中的应用[J].新医学,2016,47(10):681-685.
[14]	Kinoshita A,Onoda H,Imai N,et al.The C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio,a Novel Inflammation-Based Prognostic Score,Predicts Outcomes in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma[J].Annals of Surgical Oncology,2015,22(3):803-810.
[15]	李永胜,梅华鲜,黄中会,等.毛细血管渗漏指数对脓毒症危险分层及预后评估的价值[J].临床急诊杂志,2017,18(5):362-364.