Clinical analysis of different timing of tracheotomy in patients with acute organophosphate poisoning intermediate syndrome
-
摘要: 目的:探讨不同时机行气管切开对急性有机磷中毒中间综合征患者的临床效果。方法:选取2014-01-2016-12期间收治的62例患有急性有机磷中毒中间综合征患者展开研究。将入选研究对象随机分成对照组(32例)、观察组(30例)。两组患者均接受气管插管治疗,根据患者具体病情合理选择呼吸机模式和参数,对照组患者呼吸机撤机拔管不可能时行气管切开,观察组患者在患者插管后24h内行气管切开,比较两组患者的临床效果、各项手术指标、APACHEⅡ评分以及GCS评分。结果:观察组患者治疗后的治愈率(93.33%)显著高于对照组(68.75%),与之对应的死亡率(6.67%)则显著低于对照组(31.25%),比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者肺部感染率和中毒反跳率(6.67%、0)显著低于对照组(28.13%、15.63%),比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者的阿托品总用量[(175.81±14.20) mg]显著少于对照组[(214.52±22.47) mg],且观察组阿托品化时间、意识恢复时间、胆碱酯酶活性恢复时间、机械通气时间以及住院时间[(2.72±0.44) h、(2.72±0.44) h、(7.97±1.45) d、(7.60±0.86) d、(7.60±0.86) d]均短于对照组[(3.61±1.03) h、(4.57±1.10) h、(9.26±1.58) d、(10.35±1.61) d、(20.36±1.98) d],比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者抢救成功后的APACHEⅡ评分[(15.67±2.20)分]明显低于对照组患者[(22.82±3.24)分],对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者抢救成功后的GCS评分[(13.60±2.45)分]明显高于对照组患者[(10.07±1.51)分],对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:急性有机磷中毒中间综合征患者尽早行器官切开有助于降低病死率和感染、中毒反跳等并发症发生,且可促进患者预后康复,改善APACHEⅡ和GCS评分,值得推广应用。Abstract: Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of tracheotomy in different timing on patients with intermediate syndrome of acute organophosphate poisoning.Method:Totally 62 patients with intermediate syndrome of acute organophosphate poisoning were enrolled in the study from January 2014 to December 2016.The selected subjects were randomly divided into control group (32 cases) and observation group (30 cases).According to the specific conditions of patients, both groups received endotracheal intubation with reasonable choices of ventilator mode and parameters.The patients in the observation group received tracheotomies within 24 hours after intubation, while the patients in the control group had tracheotomies only when there was no chance to wean ventilators.The clinical effects, various surgical indicators, APACHEⅡ score and GCS score were compared between the two groups.Result:The cure rate (96.67%) in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (78.13%) and the corresponding mortality rate (3.33%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (21.87%), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The lung infection rate and poisoning rate (6.67%, 0) in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (28.13%, 15.63%), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The total amount of atropine used in the observation group (175.81±14.20) mg was significantly less than that of the control group (214.52±22.47) mg, meanwhile the observation group's atropisol time, consciousness recovery time, recovery time of cholinesterase activity, duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay (2.72±0.44 h, 2.72±0.44 h, 7.97±1.45 d, 7.60±0.86 d, 7.60±0.86 d) were significantly shorter than those in the control group (3.61±1.03 h, 4.57±1.10 h, 9.26±1.58 d, 10.35±1.61 dand 20.36±1.98 d), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The APACHEⅡ scores in the observation group (15.67±2.20) after successful rescue were significantly lower than those in the control group (22.82±3.24), and the GCS scores (13.60±2.45) in the observation group after successful rescue were significantly higher than that in the control group (10.07±1.51), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion:Early tracheotomy on patients with intermediate syndrome of acute organophosphate poisoning is conductive to reduce the incidence of complications such as mortality and infection, poisoning and rebound, promote the prognosis of patients and improve APACHEⅡand GCS scores, which deserves wide application.
-
[1] 覃立行, 潘靖华, 苏家林, 等.急性重度有机磷农药中毒行血浆置换联合血液灌流治疗的临床效果以及对炎性因子的影响[J].临床急诊杂志, 2016, 17 (4):110-111.
[2] 中国医师协会急诊医师分会.急性有机磷农药中毒诊治临床专家共识[J].中国急救医学, 2016, 36 (12):1057-1065.
[3] Sánchez M B S, Valdivieso A M H, Villanueva M M.Potential clinical application of surface electromyography as indicator of neuromuscular recovery during weaning tests after organophosphate poisoning[J].Rev Bras Ter Intensiva, 2017, 29:253-258.
[4] 董建光, 邱泽武.1000例有机磷农药中毒误诊分析[J].临床急诊杂志, 2016, 17 (10):739-742.
[5] 张妍.急性有机磷农药中毒致中间综合征的临床分析与前瞻性研究[J].中国医药指南, 2015, 13 (2):150-151.
[6] 孔宙.48例急性有机磷中毒合并中间综合征危险因素的探讨[J].吉林医学, 2015, 36 (4):613-615.
[7] 余凌云, 吴志德, 魏坦明, 等.急性农药中毒患者医院感染危险因素分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志, 2015, 25 (9):2052-2054.
[8] 陈小娟.气管切开内插管的护理[J].中国实用医药, 2014, 9 (1):246-247.
[9] Terekhov S S, Palikov V A, Palikova Y A.Application of tetrameric recombinant human butyrylcholinesterase as a biopharmaceutical for amelioration of symptoms of acute organophosphate poisoning[J].Bull Exp Biol Med, 2017, 163:430-435.
[10] 石俊生, 任冬, 许凌峰.长托宁联合阿托品治疗急性重度有机磷中毒的临床应用[J].中国急救医学, 2016, 36 (1):130-131.
[11] 涂学平, 袁鹰, 鄢忠平, 等.阿托品与长托宁联合治疗重度急性有机磷农药中毒的疗效[J].临床急诊杂志, 2016, 17 (12):932-934.
[12] 许红艳, 严震行, 陈园园.急性有机磷中毒合并呼吸衰竭患者医院感染的相关因素分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志, 2014, 24 (18):4504-4506.
[13] Adinew G M, Asrie A B, Birru E M.Pattern of acute organophosphorus poisoning at University of Gondar Teaching Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia[J].BMC Res Notes, 2017, 10:149-149.
[14] 刘鑫, 焦鹏, 井先成, 等.血液灌流联合血液透析治疗急诊重症有机磷农药中毒对疗效及预后的影响[J].临床急诊杂志, 2016, 17 (4):283-285.
[15] 王远明.有机磷农药中毒至中间综合征、喉头水肿的诊治体会[J].中国伤残医学, 2014, 22 (2):164-166.
[16] 訾云香.系统抢救及护理对急性有机磷农药中毒救护效果的影响[J].中国医药指南, 2014, 12 (24):318-319.
[17] 王万灵, 王灵, 王振华, 等.探索急性有机磷农药中毒早期可以预测需要机械通气的指标[J].中国现代医学杂志, 2016, 26 (2):103-106.
计量
- 文章访问数: 122
- PDF下载数: 49
- 施引文献: 0